Is anybody talking about the Duleep Trophy here? I think South Zone will win hands down if Dravid and Laxman play for them- hopefully or even otherwise.
LOL.
This is the record of South Zone whenever Laxman played since 2000:
vs. NZ, 3-5, vvs captain
vs. SZ 3-5, rd captain
vs. EZ LOSS, rd captain
vs. CZ LOSS, vvs captain
vs. WZ LOSS, rd captain
vs. NZ LOSS, vvs captain
vs. WZ LOSS, vvs captain
vs. WZ WIN, vvs captain
vs. SL-A LOSS, vvs captain
vs. CZ, 5-3, vvs captain
So in 10 matches, 6 outright losses, 2 losses on first innings, 1 first-innings lead, and only ONE outright win. His captaincy record speaks for itself.
Yes as opposed to the mediocre Ganguly and his captaincy when captaining India or KKR leave alone a zonal side.
Let us dissect it.
Despite having greats like RD, VVS, SRT at his disposal with the bat and AK and Darty(pre-2007 one) along with a younger ZK, Srinath etc he has no wins where he can take credit for in Tests.
Couple of examples -
Eden 2001 - (VVS, RD with the bat nothing from bat of Ganguly)
Adelaide 2003 (RD, VVS with the bat nothing from bat of Ganguly)
In short
As a Test captain for 5 years this guy did nothing but ride on the bats of greats such as VVS, RD etc while lazing on his game so much so that he averaged 35.00 or so in those 5 years a mark bettered by bowling all-rounder Vettori close to 39 average and WK all-rounder MSD 40+ average.
It got so bad that the then coach GC had to take a tough stance to remove Ganguly primarily because of his attitude and refusing to change and work on his game. By the way the only master stroke of GC while he was the coach.
Coming to ODI's again having some of the best talent around he lost 13 Finals a record thus far and a shaming WC Finals loss when the whole world wanted India to bat upon winning the toss. Single most brain freezing moment in Indian cricketing history. India could have won the Final had they batted first. Well that error was corrected by MSD who got us the much needed WC trophy 28 years later after goof-ups by skippers such as Ganguly who proved to be a bad leader outside of getting wins due to individual brilliance in the presence of great players (such as Eden 2001 or Adelaide 2003).
Speaking of Ganguly being a bad leader outside of having great players and results due to individual brilliance his stint with KKR gives one a chance to reflect upon it. SRK after the player auction entrusts Ganguly with the captaincy of the KKR team. Ganguly messes it up so bad while being not able to deal with the local talent to blend in with the abroad players KKR remained the only team in his 3 years there to not make a SF round (Yes the rest of the teams made it to the SF atleast once in that span). It has gotten so bad in the 2nd year that Ganguly had rifts with the coach there (What else is new?) and as per the reports they were groups with in the team and it is such a shame that KKR became a laughing stock with this unwanted circus outside of the playing field. SRK after 3 years of this non-sense had to make a call and he along with Whatmore had to cut Ganguly loose from all teams the Kolkata team. Think about that. Ganguly being let go despite the threats of a backlash and SRK was prepared to face the consequences.
Contrast that to MSD, AK, Gilly, Warne, SRT etc. They all did well to lead and show leadership skills to inspire the local talent to blend in with the abroad players and got the teams to SF or later atleast once. In MSD's case he won the IPL outright twice.
While it is easy to make of fun of others(VVS, RD etc) there are some gaping holes when it comes to Ganguly and his leadership skills. So if I were a fan of Ganguly I would think twice to poke fun at others.