You would better think how Rahul would have felt when forced to keep despite batting better then Ganguly at that point.
Let’s start at the beginning then.
All too easy to forget that RD played as a wicketkeeper, immediately before SG took over as captain. 6 matches under 3 captains, prior to SG. (Azhar, Jadeja, SRT)
Never mind that history, which may not agree with you.
Even then......
Before he was a wicket keeper, here is his record.
Matches/Inn/runs/avg/SR/100s/50s
83 76 2538 36.25 67.35 4 17
And, at that same date, 23rd May 1999, before RD became a wicketkeeper; SG had this record.
102 97 3628 40.76 68.66 6 26
Ignoring the fact that SG, did not have to consider
your ERRONEOUS belief RD was better, he IN FACT, supported the belief, that despite RDs poor performances as an ODI player, his wicketkeeping skills along with the genius he was
should keep him in the team. A viewpoint he fought for, despite managerial and media opposition, and succeeded in getting his way, a viewpoint extensively discussed in John Wright’s Indian Summers.
Anyway, your primary claim, that RD was better than SG at that point is a LIE.Thank God, Dravid did not take out his frustration with Ganguly in the WC 2003 .
Maybe he should have been grateful then?
He did not need to be. HIS GREATNESS (RD that is) was sensed an used in the indian team despite his relative non performance. SG was responsible for that, keep a class player in the team despite MEGA calls for his cull.
People with parochial hatred and others with personal agendas, fail to see this viewpoint. I sympathise with them.
Therefore, I do not agree with you, since I believe in the integrity of cricketers, and most people in the scheme of things, which somehow eludes you.
for you to answer to yourself.
May be you would feel better on how Kumble would have felt when he was repeatedly dropped in favour of a non-performing chamcha.
maybe you will wake up? any chances?