Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Poll

Should Delhi be removed as an international venue

yes
- 11 (64.7%)
no
- 6 (35.3%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

AuthorTopic: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.  (Read 1796 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Please post once and this message will disappear! Introduce yourself, say hello, jump into a discussion...

hastalavistababy

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,075
  • Money: 28414.00
Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« on: December 27, 2009, 06:02:49 AM »
Should Delhi be removed as an international venue
Logged
N=NERO, N=NANDIGRAM, N=NANDAN

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,127
  • Money: 2038307.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2009, 06:05:57 AM »
absolutely. no place for dilli or dilliwalahs who support this type of administrations in cricket.
Logged

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,127
  • Money: 2038307.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2009, 06:08:49 AM »
"Some section are chanting irate slogans."

unpatriotic and what not also. cp, please give your expert opinion on deshdrohis being part of the dilli establishment.
Logged

Cover Point

  • Cover Point
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,532
  • Money: 2596708.00
  • Cover Point
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2009, 06:39:48 AM »
"Some section are chanting irate slogans."

unpatriotic and what not also. cp, please give your expert opinion on deshdrohis being part of the dilli establishment.

hmm being mad at ddca is deshdrohi? Were the slogans anti India?

and to answer ... yes delhi should be removed from international venue until they can prove that they can produce a safe pitch.

this one was clearly not safe
Logged
Busting Gangulian chops since eternity.

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,127
  • Money: 2038307.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2009, 06:46:12 AM »
"Some section are chanting irate slogans."

unpatriotic and what not also. cp, please give your expert opinion on deshdrohis being part of the dilli establishment.

hmm being mad at ddca is deshdrohi? Were the slogans anti India?

and to answer ... yes delhi should be removed from international venue until they can prove that they can produce a safe pitch.

this one was clearly not safe


why not a yes vote then
Logged

Cover Point

  • Cover Point
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,532
  • Money: 2596708.00
  • Cover Point
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2009, 07:24:19 AM »
"Some section are chanting irate slogans."

unpatriotic and what not also. cp, please give your expert opinion on deshdrohis being part of the dilli establishment.

hmm being mad at ddca is deshdrohi? Were the slogans anti India?

and to answer ... yes delhi should be removed from international venue until they can prove that they can produce a safe pitch.

this one was clearly not safe


why not a yes vote then

my words arent enough? Usually u stick to them like ganguly to politicians!
Logged
Busting Gangulian chops since eternity.

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,127
  • Money: 2038307.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2009, 07:27:58 AM »
"Some section are chanting irate slogans."

unpatriotic and what not also. cp, please give your expert opinion on deshdrohis being part of the dilli establishment.

hmm being mad at ddca is deshdrohi? Were the slogans anti India?

and to answer ... yes delhi should be removed from international venue until they can prove that they can produce a safe pitch.

this one was clearly not safe


why not a yes vote then

my words arent enough?

Funny that you ask...
Logged

kingcool1432

  • Hakuna Matata
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Money: 69925.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2009, 08:02:51 AM »
From CI:

1.10 Interesting bit of information our bulletin writer has just dug up. Per the ICC's Code of Conduct, after the first occasion of a venue producing a pitch unfit for play the immediate punishment is, and I quote: "A suspension of the venue's international status for a period of between 12 and 24 months together with a directive for appropriate remedial action and the need for prior ICC re-accreditation as an international venue." Now that leaves the Kotla's holding any matches in the 2011 World Cup in the balance.

I guess to ban or not to ban wasn't even a question.
Logged
Reality continues to ruin my life.  Homicidal Psycho Jungle Cat, p67-1

vincent

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,206
  • Money: 428470.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2009, 09:21:50 AM »
Now I am really worried about the ability to professionally manage the Commonwealth Games.
Logged

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,127
  • Money: 2038307.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #9 on: December 27, 2009, 09:50:44 AM »
Now I am really worried about the ability to professionally manage the Commonwealth Games.

Worried? I think the real question is how to minimize the disaster!
Logged

ramshorns

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12,988
  • Money: 3867418.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #10 on: December 27, 2009, 05:49:57 PM »
This is a shame of epic proportions.   What the heck was Chauhan and co. doing heading the DDCA.   Shameless buggers.   They put in their papers now.   Too little too late.   They should be snatched their right to stage the world cup as a penalty.   This is not the first time it has happended this with Delhi.  Just refunding the ticket money to the paying public will not do it here.    Arun Jaitley - are you listening,  you clown.

It is a matter of laughing stock now because it already has gotten the attention of one and all across the nations.   This reeks of incompetence of the highest order.  I just cannot believe they did not have a process in place to tick things off while preparing things to stage an International match.

The only saving grace if there is one is none of these games matter and are meaningless as BCCI is holding them to print money and for all the wrong reasons.  That apart it brought to the fore once again the problems in Delhi cricket which we all know of over the recent years - the quotas in selections, nepotism of the highest order even by Indian standards - it almost seems apt that this has happended.
Logged

Cover Point

  • Cover Point
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,532
  • Money: 2596708.00
  • Cover Point
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #11 on: December 27, 2009, 06:36:35 PM »
the first person who should have taken the blame is the president of the DDCA, one politician by the name of Arun Jaitley. He does nothing at all for the DDCA and only thing that happens in his regime is corruption and freeloading.

It is a shame that one of the few people who actually did any work Chetan Chauhan has had to resign for this. When you put politicians like Jaitley incharge this is what happens.

Logged
Busting Gangulian chops since eternity.

WicketView

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,969
  • Money: 1274271.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #12 on: December 27, 2009, 06:46:29 PM »
Has Jaitley not resigned? I hope enough people pressurize him to. Then again, some people are not known to possess feelings like embarrassment and shame, so he may choose to continue despite everything. 
Logged

Cover Point

  • Cover Point
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,532
  • Money: 2596708.00
  • Cover Point
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #13 on: December 27, 2009, 06:48:49 PM »
Has Jaitley not resigned? I hope enough people pressurize him to. Then again, some people are not known to possess feelings like embarrassment and shame, so he may choose to continue despite everything.

i have not heard anything about him resigning. ci reported that chauhan and the curator resigned.

jaitley is a congress politician... what do you expect?
Logged
Busting Gangulian chops since eternity.

Cernunnos

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,958
  • Money: 803707.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2009, 06:55:01 PM »
What I do not understand is the DDCA did relay the pitch to address this very issue, so you can't accuse of them of not trying. The general corruption notwithstanding, I think this was basically an experiment gone horribly wrong. I don't see a financial motive of relaying a poor pitch.
Logged

Cover Point

  • Cover Point
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,532
  • Money: 2596708.00
  • Cover Point
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #15 on: December 27, 2009, 06:59:58 PM »
What I do not understand is the DDCA did relay the pitch to address this very issue, so you can't accuse of them of not trying. The general corruption notwithstanding, I think this was basically an experiment gone horribly wrong. I don't see a financial motive of relaying a poor pitch.


ddca is corrupt. walking into the kotla you can see the impact of corruption ... from the free tickets to the caterers to the work performed on the stadium. it starts at the top with Jaitley.

not just that ... u saw sehwag complain about the selection committee etc. sab saale chor hain.

unlike the gangulians who cant see anything criticized in their state, us delhites say it how it is.
Logged
Busting Gangulian chops since eternity.

Cernunnos

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,958
  • Money: 803707.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #16 on: December 27, 2009, 07:15:00 PM »
What I do not understand is the DDCA did relay the pitch to address this very issue, so you can't accuse of them of not trying. The general corruption notwithstanding, I think this was basically an experiment gone horribly wrong. I don't see a financial motive of relaying a poor pitch.


ddca is corrupt. walking into the kotla you can see the impact of corruption ... from the free tickets to the caterers to the work performed on the stadium. it starts at the top with Jaitley.

not just that ... u saw sehwag complain about the selection committee etc. sab saale chor hain.

unlike the gangulians who cant see anything criticized in their state, us delhites say it how it is.

I acknowledge the corruption bit. But explain what financial motive could be there for relaying a poor pitch? It is not like it costs more to make a better pitch! Yes, had they not taken any action and left things as they were, then I can see that they basically wanted to pocket that money. But in this case, they did take action and relaid a new pitch.

Unlike pointing fingers and sloganeering for the sake of it, we "gangulians" like to get to the bottom of things in a calm and reasoned manner, keeping aside state loyalties. 
Logged

Cover Point

  • Cover Point
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,532
  • Money: 2596708.00
  • Cover Point
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #17 on: December 27, 2009, 07:19:19 PM »
What I do not understand is the DDCA did relay the pitch to address this very issue, so you can't accuse of them of not trying. The general corruption notwithstanding, I think this was basically an experiment gone horribly wrong. I don't see a financial motive of relaying a poor pitch.


ddca is corrupt. walking into the kotla you can see the impact of corruption ... from the free tickets to the caterers to the work performed on the stadium. it starts at the top with Jaitley.

not just that ... u saw sehwag complain about the selection committee etc. sab saale chor hain.

unlike the gangulians who cant see anything criticized in their state, us delhites say it how it is.

I acknowledge the corruption bit. But explain what financial motive could be there for relaying a poor pitch? It is not like it costs more to make a better pitch! Yes, had they not taken any action and left things as they were, then I can see that they basically wanted to pocket that money. But in this case, they did take action and relaid a new pitch.

Unlike pointing fingers and sloganeering for the sake of it, we "gangulians" like to get to the bottom of things in a calm and reasoned manner, keeping aside state loyalties.

there is no financial motive in laying a poor pitch. but the corruption breeds incompetence. when cronies of jaitley have plum jobs and contracts ... thats what happens.

basically thats whats been happening in delhi for a while. Lot of money changed hands in the construction of the kotla. corruption was instrumental in team selection. in handing out of contracts for various things.

Logged
Busting Gangulian chops since eternity.

Cernunnos

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,958
  • Money: 803707.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #18 on: December 27, 2009, 07:26:26 PM »
What I do not understand is the DDCA did relay the pitch to address this very issue, so you can't accuse of them of not trying. The general corruption notwithstanding, I think this was basically an experiment gone horribly wrong. I don't see a financial motive of relaying a poor pitch.


ddca is corrupt. walking into the kotla you can see the impact of corruption ... from the free tickets to the caterers to the work performed on the stadium. it starts at the top with Jaitley.

not just that ... u saw sehwag complain about the selection committee etc. sab saale chor hain.

unlike the gangulians who cant see anything criticized in their state, us delhites say it how it is.

I acknowledge the corruption bit. But explain what financial motive could be there for relaying a poor pitch? It is not like it costs more to make a better pitch! Yes, had they not taken any action and left things as they were, then I can see that they basically wanted to pocket that money. But in this case, they did take action and relaid a new pitch.

Unlike pointing fingers and sloganeering for the sake of it, we "gangulians" like to get to the bottom of things in a calm and reasoned manner, keeping aside state loyalties.

there is no financial motive in laying a poor pitch. but the corruption breeds incompetence. when cronies of jaitley have plum jobs and contracts ... thats what happens.

But Chetan Chauhan was in charge of the pitch. And you said he was a good man who does good work. Moreover the Pitch and Grounds committee which oversees this is a BCCI appointed body.
So why not use the same logic ("corruption breeds incompetence") on the BCCI?

Quote
basically thats whats been happening in delhi for a while. Lot of money changed hands in the construction of the kotla. corruption was instrumental in team selection. in handing out of contracts for various things.

As I said, I don't deny the corruption bit. But we'll have to see if this pitch fiasco is a direct result of corruption or not. I do not want to pin blame on someone just for the sake of it.
Logged

WicketView

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,969
  • Money: 1274271.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #19 on: December 27, 2009, 07:54:33 PM »
How competent was the curator? If he has produced reasonable pitches for a while, he is probably not incompetent. If he was picked up from the middle of nowhere because of contacts, then he might be incompetent.
Logged

Cernunnos

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,958
  • Money: 803707.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #20 on: December 27, 2009, 08:13:24 PM »
In fact, the BCCI, and Madugalle and Richardson, will have the ICC’s own previous internal assessments to explain as well: A venue evaluation report undertaken at the Kotla on November 4 was scathing in its observation of the Kotla pitch. The document, a copy of which is in TOI’s possession, even raises doubts about the venue’s ability to host the World Cup games. It states: "The ICC has important issues with the present condition of the playing surface that is essential to address prior to the 2011 World Cup. It’s clear to see that surface levels need to be readjusted and the surface is mostly devoid of grass."

Did this report lead to the hasty attempts to plant some grass and level the surface, attempts which led to Sunday’s disaster? The report also advises against replanting or reseeding the pitches - an advice the DDCA did not heed - and complains about the local curator’s "variance" with BCCI pitch consultant Daljit Singh.

"To simply replant without major renovation of the surface would be a major miscalculation. It would lead to pitches being slow, spongy and would tend to generate low, inconsistent bounce," the report said.

Given Sunday’s colossal mistake, it would seem the DDCA, and in turn the BCCI, will have a lot of explaining to do to evade a serious ban

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/series-tournaments/sri-lanka-in-india-2009/top-stories/Kotlas-World-Cup-games-hang-in-balance/articleshow/5385860.cms


This is what likely happened. The ICC did not like the previous Ind-Aus pitch as it was not a typical belter and a turning track, certainly not to the liking of the Aussies. So in order to placate the ICC, the BCCI tried a quick-fix approach, which went all awry.

Btw, why did Delhi get to host an ODI after hosting one just 2 months ago? If there was a question mark on the pitch, what was the need to hold another ODI so soon?
« Last Edit: December 27, 2009, 08:16:39 PM by Cernunnos »
Logged

kban1

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,964
  • Money: 1066884.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #21 on: December 27, 2009, 08:16:53 PM »
How competent was the curator? If he has produced reasonable pitches for a while, he is probably not incompetent. If he was picked up from the middle of nowhere because of contacts, then he might be incompetent.

I think the problem is that the pitch was relaid on November 6 (8?) after the Aus ODI  -- which is approximately 50 days.

A good curator will tell you that is too little of a time to lay a pitch, which ideally takes 90 - 120 days.

So its the DDCA's decision to relay the pitch following complaints of it being slow and low during the Champion's Trophy T20 series that is at the ecnter of the issue.
Logged

WicketView

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,969
  • Money: 1274271.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #22 on: December 27, 2009, 08:34:15 PM »
OK ... so there was a stupid decision by the authorities.
Logged

ganavk

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,822
  • Money: 896482.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #23 on: December 27, 2009, 11:32:49 PM »
I did not see any of the dismissals happening because of the pitch. but ball definitely bounced from a good length ball. is this how uncovered pitches behave in the past ?
Logged

feverpitch

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,326
  • Money: 893598.00
  • Lachchha Porotta drops a dung cake
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #24 on: December 28, 2009, 06:46:25 AM »
jaitley is a congress politician... what do you expect?

Can't you even get some facts straight, ever?
Logged
"In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all life presents as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived has moved away into a representation."

Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle

keep-it-cool

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18,074
  • Money: 1714880.00
  • Thanda Thanda Kool Kool
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #25 on: December 28, 2009, 08:21:29 AM »
I have never heard of anyone accusing Jaitley of corruption before this. He is a lawyer and twists things conveniently when he speaks but my impression was that he is one of the clean politicians around.
Logged
Sachin Tendulkar gave the muhurat clap for 'Awwal Number' - that apart, he hasn't done much wrong in the last 20 yrs!

Cover Point

  • Cover Point
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,532
  • Money: 2596708.00
  • Cover Point
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #26 on: December 28, 2009, 02:10:19 PM »
jaitley is a congress politician... what do you expect?

Can't you even get some facts straight, ever?

hmm .. so he is a BJP politician. Sab saale chor hain. I personally have no party affiliations (I vote for the party that stands on the platform of anti-ganguliasm)

but surprised to see that the entire ddca is controlled by bjp in delhi where congress has been ruling for a while now.
Logged
Busting Gangulian chops since eternity.

pzd

  • Test Match Star
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 741
  • Money: 120156.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #27 on: December 28, 2009, 02:37:42 PM »
jaitley is a congress politician... what do you expect?

Can't you even get some facts straight, ever?

hmm .. so he is a BJP politician. Sab saale chor hain. I personally have no party affiliations (I vote for the party that stands on the platform of anti-ganguliasm)

but surprised to see that the entire ddca is controlled by bjp in delhi where congress has been ruling for a while now.
No wonder BJP has not won in Dilli for the last 3 consecutive elections :D
Logged

12th_Man

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,348
  • Money: 1392788.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #28 on: December 28, 2009, 03:04:46 PM »
This event was more worse than eden(light) fiasco. There were more than enough warnings.
Logged

12th_Man

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,348
  • Money: 1392788.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #29 on: December 28, 2009, 03:06:22 PM »
I however dont think it should be removed. I think this should be banned for a year or two.
Logged

kingcool1432

  • Hakuna Matata
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Money: 69925.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #30 on: December 28, 2009, 07:06:06 PM »
Chauhan adds fuel to the fire

http://www.cricinfo.com/indvsl2009/content/current/story/441567.html

"The match referee told me unofficially that one side did not want to carry on and he could not force them," Chauhan said. "It could not be India since [MS] Dhoni was willing to continue. Sri Lanka were at 83 for 5 and that's why they backed out... it was the Sri Lankans who chickened out."

Mods: Can we merge the two threads discussing this?
Logged
Reality continues to ruin my life.  Homicidal Psycho Jungle Cat, p67-1

vincent

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,206
  • Money: 428470.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #31 on: December 28, 2009, 07:22:32 PM »
Hmm, if it is true then I am very disappointed about Chauhan. His opening partner Gavaskar himself had declared the pitch as "hair transplant" which is a mild expression for bad "gardening" when you fix your lawn.
Logged

Cover Point

  • Cover Point
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,532
  • Money: 2596708.00
  • Cover Point
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #32 on: December 28, 2009, 07:40:03 PM »

Mods: Can we merge the two threads discussing this?

they better not. if they saw fit to leave two threads out here just in the hope of annoying me (unsuccessfully) then two threads can be left to discuss too.

these kids need to understand that there are consequences to their actions  :evil4:

if they do remove it ... i promise to open 10 threads for each closed one. I am willing to make that supreme sacrifice!
Logged
Busting Gangulian chops since eternity.

vincent

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,206
  • Money: 428470.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #33 on: December 28, 2009, 08:13:33 PM »
Who is to balme is the question. Is it BCCI with its eagerness to earn more money? Look at this rather lengthy debate which includes people like Chauhan, Azad, Shah etc..

    http://www.ndtv.com/news/videos/video_player.php?id=1188977


Logged

Tilal

  • 12th Man
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 144
  • Money: 93461.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #34 on: December 28, 2009, 09:53:04 PM »
Should Delhi be removed as an international venue


All Indians should fight tooth and nail if the question is tabled anywhere.   
(it does not mean the people in charge should not improve the pitch conditions - but absolutely no fire should be held back to defend Dehli's rights for hosting matches)
Logged

Cover Point

  • Cover Point
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,532
  • Money: 2596708.00
  • Cover Point
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #35 on: December 28, 2009, 10:32:16 PM »
Should Delhi be removed as an international venue


All Indians should fight tooth and nail if the question is tabled anywhere.   
(it does not mean the people in charge should not improve the pitch conditions - but absolutely no fire should be held back to defend Dehli's rights for hosting matches)

u are a true patriot! Jai Hind!
Logged
Busting Gangulian chops since eternity.

inoc

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,694
  • Money: 355363.00
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #36 on: December 29, 2009, 12:25:58 AM »

hmm being mad at ddca is deshdrohi? Were the slogans anti India?

supporting Eden gardens/ CAB is gangulian? Were any of the statements in favour of ganguly?

or anti India/?-

of note:

deshdrohi is defined by pronouncements of one self proclaimed *!&%£&a ....

and according to those criteria....it seems so is he. ;D ;D ;D


and to answer ... yes delhi should be removed from international venue until they can prove that they can produce a safe pitch.

this one was clearly not safe

no, it should not.

because it is an international venue, and will be forever. Incompetence should be punished, and efforts made to rectify the situation.

if the situation is not being rectified it is a problem with the people in charge and vicariously, BCCI......

NOT DELHI.

similar situations have happened before and none of those venues have been ostracised.

so your take on it is as knee jerk as always.

and then.......


Should Delhi be removed as an international venue


All Indians should fight tooth and nail if the question is tabled anywhere.   
(it does not mean the people in charge should not improve the pitch conditions - but absolutely no fire should be held back to defend Dehli's rights for hosting matches)

u are a true patriot! Jai Hind!

I will, in your benefit, consider your previous posts and this one as part of nominal dysphasia.

{that is when a person is able to describe a situation but is confused about the name}

thereby:

you are sure that a patriot in the DDCA matter, is a patriot, while a similar person in the CAB question is a 'desh drohi'.

so the patriot here in your own words should be anti INDIA / akin to a gangulian, desh drohi, as per your definitions etc etc....or exactly the opposite.


brings out your true colours.

I always knew it, so do most of us here.

further gangulian comments will allow you to wriggle like a worm .......go ahead if that is what you feel like.


« Last Edit: December 29, 2009, 01:49:03 AM by inoc »
Logged

keep-it-cool

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18,074
  • Money: 1714880.00
  • Thanda Thanda Kool Kool
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #37 on: December 29, 2009, 04:49:30 AM »
If a local association that has taken responsibility for hosting a match goofs up, it smacks of incompetence ..especially when the same association was given a warning earlier.

The DDCA has proven itself to be incompetent and needs to be punished ...in any case, there is a provision to ban such venues for a particular period and then reinspect before letting it host matches. I believe that process should be followed to its logical conclusion.

And if the ICC does not do it, the BCCI should do so proactively in order to send a message out that if you cant put up a good show, there are many other venues out there that can fill in.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2009, 04:51:24 AM by keep-it-cool »
Logged
Sachin Tendulkar gave the muhurat clap for 'Awwal Number' - that apart, he hasn't done much wrong in the last 20 yrs!

keep-it-cool

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18,074
  • Money: 1714880.00
  • Thanda Thanda Kool Kool
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #38 on: December 29, 2009, 05:20:10 AM »
The referee's report makes it much tougher to escape a suspension. Also, it contradicts what Chauhan seemed to hint that - i.e. Dhoni was willing to continue and it was only the Lankans who wanted it called off.

http://www.cricinfo.com/indvsl2009/content/story/441601.html

Match referee gives harshest assessment of Kotla pitch

Cricinfo staff

December 29, 2009

The possibility of the Feroz Shah Kotla being disqualified from hosting the 2011 World Cup remains high after ICC match referee Alan Hurst classified the pitch as "unfit" in his official report to the ICC, which was forwarded to the BCCI. The report was submitted in the aftermath of the abandonment of the fixture between India and Sri Lanka due to a dangerous pitch.

The classification is the harshest among the six stated categories - very good, good, above average, below average, poor and unfit. The venue could have got away with a fine had Hurst classified the surface as "poor" but given his most critical assessment, the consequences could be much worse.

"This pitch did not meet the requirements for an ODI match," Hurst is quoted to have said in his report by the Hindustan Times. "This meant the players were unsure of what the ball would do. Playing shots was risky because of the unpredictable bounce. However, of more concern was the dangerous bounce that occurred randomly and accounted for batsmen being struck on a number of occasions.

"At the other extreme, bounce was often very low. This pitch did not allow players to play with any confidence and was totally unsuitable for international cricket."

The ICC's latest code of conduct regarding poor pitches states that a first such breach should be met with "a suspension of the venue's international status for a period of between 12 and 24 months together with a directive for appropriate remedial action and the need for prior ICC re-accreditation as an international venue".

The BCCI has been given 14 days to respond to Hurst's report. It's reply, in addition with the report, video footage of the abandoned game and other significant documents will be studied by the ICC's chief referee Ranjan Madugalle and its cricket operations manager Dave Richardson, who will determine the penalty.

In his report, Hurst also enumerated 14 points to chronicle the lead-up to the abandonment. "Early on Saturday morning the fourth umpire Subrat Das went to the ground to check that a number of things were in place. He reported to me that the wicket was quite green in patches, but the Curator had told him that extra rolling during the day would mean that 'the green would turn to brown'. It was still quite green tinged when the umpires and I did our ground inspection later that afternoon," he wrote.

Hurst recorded that the Sri Lanka coach Trevor Bayliss and manager Brendon Kuruppu approached him at two stages during the game - in the tenth and the 24th over -expressing concern over the behaviour of the pitch. The report noted that play had to be stopped on three occasions -- at 9.54am, 10.05am and 10.46am -- for Sri Lanka's batsmen to receive medical treatment after being struck by the ball.

Of all the deliveries that bounced excessively or kept low over 23 overs, the umpires estimated that six were outright dangerous. Following complaints by players, the field umpires Shavir Tarapore and Marais Erasmus consulted Hurst, who walked out onto the field and spoke to the two captains, who agreed the pitch was unfit for play.

"At the edge of the ground I spoke with President DDCA (Delhi & Districts Cricket Association) Mr Arun Jaitley, Mr Narinder Batra DDCA Treasurer, BCCI Hon Secretary Mr Srinavasan, DDCA Vice-President Mr Chetan Chauhan and other local officials. I was asked whether another prepared pitch on the square could be substituted," Hurst said. "I went to the square with Mr Chauhan to look at the option, which had been partially prepared as back-up prior to the game. Although reasonably hard, it was quite heavily, but unevenly grassed. In keeping with the Playing Conditions, I then spoke with the Captains about this option. Both gave emphatic negatives."

Following the embarrassment, and facing the prospect of a dire penalty, the BCCI, in an act of damage control, moved quickly to dissolve its grounds and pitches committee. The DDCA pitch panel members resigned soon after, but any moves to rectify the situation may have come too late.

The ICC had warned the DDCA in November about the condition of the pitch and said it required "considerable improvement" before hosting its next fixture. "There is an ODI at this venue on 27th December 2009 and considerable improvement of the pitch block will be required by then to make the pitch provided more acceptable" said the report, a copy of which is with Cricinfo. The inspection was carried out on November 4, three days after third ODI of the India-Australia series.
Logged
Sachin Tendulkar gave the muhurat clap for 'Awwal Number' - that apart, he hasn't done much wrong in the last 20 yrs!

keep-it-cool

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18,074
  • Money: 1714880.00
  • Thanda Thanda Kool Kool
Re: Should Delhi be removed as an international venue.
« Reply #39 on: December 29, 2009, 04:19:29 PM »
And now Gambhir contradicts the DDCA stance as well

http://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/22814/match-referee-did-the-right-thing:-gambhir/?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=news&utm_campaign=gadget

Gautam Gambhir said Match Referee Alan Hurst did the right thing by abandoning the fifth and final India-Sri Lanka ODI because the Ferozeshah Kotla track was not fit for an international game.

Even though Delhi and District Cricket Association claimed matches have been played on worse surface than at the Kotla and Hurst should have considered another track that was offered, Gambhir saw logic in Hurst's decision to call off the game.

"I think the Match Referee has done the right thing. He must have given it a serious thought. It was not an ideal wicket for a one day international match," Gambhir told reporters after he was signed as the brand ambassador of Seagram's Royal Stag Mega Cricket.

India went into the fateful match with an unassailable 3-1 lead in the five-match ODI series and the game was abandoned after 23.3 overs because of the dangerous track where balls rose alarmingly.

Dismissing DDCA claims that the match could have carried on, Gambhir said, "The whole world now knows why the match was called off. Had the wicket been alright, there would have been a full match on Sunday.

"This is an embarrassing situation which doesn't happen often and someone has to stand up and take the responsibility," he said.

Gambhir's view was in stark contrast with DDCA vice president Chetan Chauhan's assertion that Sri Lanka actually "chickened out" of the match sensing a defeat and the match officials, including Hurst, did not make an honest effort to carry on with the match.

Following Hurst's negative report, the International Cricket Council has already sought an explanation from BCCI to be furnished in two weeks before it decides on the punishment for the venue, which may lead to a ban of upto two years.

Gambhir said if not for the Kotla pitch playing spoilsport, India would have ended the year on a winning note.

"It was both embarrassing and disappointing. A 4-1 win would have looked more comprehensive. We wanted to end the year on a high with a win. It would have given us a momentum going into the tri-series in Bangladesh (starting on January 4)," he rued.

Gambhir said he had no issues with batting at No.3 in ODIs and he was happy to drop down the order to pave way for Sachin Tendulkar in India's one day line-up.

"When you have two of world's best openers, you don't think about that. With two legends of the game opening, you have to give them the honour. They have a great record together and I'm happy playing down the order," Gambhir said.

"I'm happy playing at whatever position I'm offered. Slot doesn't matter. What really matters is how much you contribute. I'm happy while opening. Even when I'm not, I want to contribute as much as possible for the team," he mentioned.

In fact, so impressive was Gambhir at the top that Sehwag called him the best Indian opener since Sunil Gavaskar.

"It's a big compliment, coming from Sehwag but I think I have a long way to go. It's important for me to do consistently well," said the reticent player, who is ranked number one Test batsman in ICC rankings.

Gambhir remains a fan of the longer version of the game and he supported India captain MS Dhoni's suggestion that it should be mandatory for teams to play a minimum number of Test matches.

"Test cricket is the ultimate challenge for a cricketer. Every cricketer wants to do well in this format. We slug three-four hours in the nets not to do well in ODIs or Twenty20s. If you are a middle order bat, you mostly have 10-15 balls in a Twenty20 match. Legends are born from Test cricket."

"Dhoni is right. India should play more Test cricket. The Cricket Board is trying to arrange more Tests and that is a positive sign," he said.

India, the current number one Test team, had just two Tests -- both against minnows Bangladesh -- scheduled in the next 11 months before BCCI woke up from its slumber to squeeze in a two-Test series against South Africa early next year.

"The more Tests, the better. There are some players who play only Test cricket. So if you play just two or four Test matches, it's difficult for them. There should be a minimum number of Test to be played and if any team wants to play more, they should be welcomed," he said.

Talking about his own form, Gambhir paid a rich tribute to India coach Gary Kirsten, singling him out for India's rise as the number one Test team.

"We never had a better coach. Gary contributed the most in our rise and I've played my best cricket under him," Gambhir said of the South African.

"We had coaches earlier also and they had more or less the same set of players. Gary handled us differently. He gave us space and kept the atmosphere light. Even when we didn't do well -- like in Asia Cup -- he never criticised. He didn't create panic or controversy and gave enough confidence to the batsmen and bowlers."

"Personally speaking, he did not change much of my game. It helped that he himself was a left-hander. He shared certain things with me, like how a bowler plots against a left-hander. It helped me a lot and made a lot of difference to my batting, especially in Tests," Gambhir explained.
Logged
Sachin Tendulkar gave the muhurat clap for 'Awwal Number' - that apart, he hasn't done much wrong in the last 20 yrs!
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up