WN:
Sir.. the intent of the post was not as ominous as you have taken it to be.
First of all, apologies if you took this as attack on your cricketing knowhow and/or parochial nature of your support for SG- never did I mean it to be that way...and I (and imo, the entire DG) know your cricket knowledge is superb - it is broad and deep.
Kban - whether you like it or not, you do have a tendency to support SG even in sometimes absurd situations. When I saw the incident this morning the first thing that came to my mind was your defence of SG from last year's IPL game involving Warne (I do not remember the detailed specifics at this point but I do remember that it was cut-n-dry that SG was wrong ) wherein I remember you coming up with all kinds of povs (nuances, if you will) defending that behavior. I will not and do not want to speculate on the reasons for why you did that (I know it was not parochial) .. but you did it.
Personally, I feel match thread is a medium that simulates the environment of bunch of fans/friends watching the game (in the living room)while chit-chatting/commenting on the game while having fun with each other...and occassional leg pulling (not the tedious, repetitive kind) is part of the fun.
I will be honest with you, at that moment in the game, when SG stretched his hand.. the first thought that came to my mind was last year's incident and another long debate where-in you were going to defend SG' action .. and so I posted it right away - it was mostly meant to be in humor and I was pulling your leg in the usual manner utilizing your well-known tendency to write long posts.
Sorry again.
First of all, thanks for the explanation. It makes things lucid and I can see that it was intended as a joke from your end, even though I did not see it as such.
Second of all, an apology was not required (an explanation was enough). Your graciousness is quite refreshing.
Third -- and the reason I got upset was the assumption that you would think I would somehow argue that this was ok. Of course not -- he was an idiot, first for running slow, then for trying to avoid being hit by raising his hand. It is obstruction --per rules. DC had all rights to appeal and he should have been given out, but the umpire messed up.
I do find it odd that you thought this incident was comparable (in terms of being cut and dry and openness to debate) to the RR match from last year where the dispute was over whether the ball was caught cleanly in the outfield. The debate was over whether SG asking the umpire's opinion wrt to the legitimacy of the catch was dissent / influencing the umpire or something within his rights as long as he was not influencing the umpire.
You are free to check the past threads as well as the match clip -- the catch was debatable, and so was the interpretation of whether SG was guilty of dissent / influencing the umpire. In that instance you and I had different ideas about whether SG was influencing the umpire or had the right to ask a question. That hardly meant your POV was the established standard and mine (and there were others who argued my point) the absurd justification.
More importantly, looking at it from another standpoint, had SG not been the person in question in that incident, would you have thought that my argument was predicated on my absurd defence of a "favorite" player ? - assuming that you would have deemed my argument as full of "absurd nuances" in the first place ?
I know you would say that had it not been SG, kban wouold not have made that argument (that is the unspoken part) but
when it is SG (and there have been enough reasons why he has been in the controversial spotlight) the argument has been that why doesn't kban take up the cases of other players with equal fervor ?
And when such other players' cases have come up (infrequent but still) such as SRT's batting (Multan 194), VVS & AK (inclusion from ODI squad), RD (the argument for keeping him a rope to help him find his feet amidst a form slump), and I have argued the same in their favor,
I dont seem to have heard this line of argument about absurd support for a "favorite" player even though some of my POVs contrasted with others drastically.
This is an interesting point -- a point of perception that is worth thinking of, dont you think ?