Topic: IPL 2009 - Match 35 (DD vs MI) (Read 3618 times)

LosingNow · « **Reply #80 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:49:10 PM »

dot dot from LM

Cover Point · « **Reply #81 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:50:30 PM »

why can t they stand outside the crease for Malinga.

We have a bowler in our league who always bowls consistently at a yorker length. I just stand 2 steps outside the crease andd I always get a full toss from him. Unfortunately I am not always talented enough to hit those for 4's ... but he rarely can get me out (otherwise he is one of the better bowlers in the league)

Cover Point · « **Reply #82 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:51:09 PM »

Dilshan .... goes home early ... to collect from the bookies.

LosingNow · « **Reply #83 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:51:12 PM »

Dilshan falls..

Cover Point · « **Reply #84 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:51:52 PM »

sab saale chor hain!

LosingNow · « **Reply #85 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:52:52 PM »

awesome bowling by LM

Cover Point · « **Reply #86 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:53:07 PM »

so only 2 off that over?

LosingNow · « **Reply #87 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:53:19 PM »

Quote from: Cover Point on May 08, 2009, 05:51:52 PM

sab saale chor hain!

ha.. kissi ke paas skill to hain hi nahin

Cover Point · « **Reply #88 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:53:35 PM »

we need to get these runs in this over.

Cover Point · « **Reply #89 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:54:13 PM »

6 off 11 needed now. AB hits a boundry. Asli dilli waala yehi hai

LosingNow · « **Reply #90 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:54:45 PM »

why was that not a no ball - waist high full toss

gouravk · « **Reply #91 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:54:58 PM »

hmm ... chalo theeke .. mumbai are out of it ... but delhi is a very booooooring team

Cover Point · « **Reply #92 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:55:27 PM »

Quote from: winningnow on May 08, 2009, 05:54:45 PM

why was that not a no ball - waist high full toss

the game is fixed

LosingNow · « **Reply #93 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:55:59 PM »

ABDV 50!!

ramshorns · « **Reply #94 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:56:23 PM »

With all the hype sorrounding players like Tendulkar it is players like De Villiars and Dilshan that will make or break it for you. These two have won games literally for DD while chasing even before this game.

And we have all these losers out there trying to get petitons out based on past deeds. Not the players fault certainly but then they have all these fans who are just hung up in the past refusing to see things as they are and enjoying the present.

LosingNow · « **Reply #95 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:56:58 PM »

Game over.. facile win.

MI done and dusted in this IPL.

Who will SRT get angry at this time?

Cover Point · « **Reply #96 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:57:33 PM »

and the game is over.

Chalo atleast GodK got irritated.

Next game ... bring on those Bengalis.

And Dhoni andh is madrasis may take note. We have beaten you once ... and we will beat you again

LosingNow · « **Reply #97 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:57:39 PM »

WOW.. some fireworks

ramshorns · « **Reply #98 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:57:59 PM »

Quote from: winningnow on May 08, 2009, 05:56:58 PM

Game over.. facile win.

MI done and dusted in this IPL.

Who will SRT get angry at this time?

How about himself?

But I do not see that coming.

gouravk · « **Reply #99 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:58:54 PM »

as per kic they still have a mathematical chance dont they ? to me it looks like CSK,RR,DD,DC are the semifinalists at this stage.

Cover Point · « **Reply #100 on:** May 08, 2009, 05:59:10 PM »

Delhi has won 6 out of 8 games.

This without playing Wrath and even benching Vettori.

and this is the third consecutive game without She-wag too.

Cover Point · « **Reply #101 on:** May 08, 2009, 06:00:25 PM »

I will miss having Dilshan, Devilliars and Warner from my team in the T20 WC.

I will atleast get to watch Warner personally on June 6th at the OVAL

gouravk · « **Reply #102 on:** May 08, 2009, 06:07:45 PM »

if punjab lose tomoro will they also be more or less out of it ?

vincent · « **Reply #103 on:** May 08, 2009, 06:10:48 PM »

Very bad captaincy by SRT. Bravo with econ rate of 2 bowled only 1 over. And SRT decided to bowl himself out of the game.

ruchir · « **Reply #104 on:** May 08, 2009, 06:11:09 PM »

After all the initial hype and hurrah, which of the Indian olds have proven adequate in IPL? SRT? SG? AK? VVS? RD?

gouravk · « **Reply #105 on:** May 08, 2009, 06:13:36 PM »

definitely RD and AK have done quite well

ramshorns · « **Reply #106 on:** May 08, 2009, 06:30:05 PM »

Quote from: gouravk on May 08, 2009, 06:13:36 PM

definitely RD and AK have done quite well

Good is relative terms.

Not Warner, Naman Ojha, Dilshan, Yusuf Pathan, De Villiars, Bopara, Yuvraj, Pragyan Ojha, Hayden, Raina, RP Singh, Nehra good to name a few(mind you these are just from top of my head) that literally won games for the team with some stellar performances.

ganavk · « **Reply #107 on:** May 08, 2009, 06:32:57 PM »

Quote from: ruchir on May 08, 2009, 06:11:09 PM

After all the initial hype and hurrah, which of the Indian olds have proven adequate in IPL? SRT? SG? AK? VVS? RD?

RD -> AK -> SRT -> SG in that order. SG was almost as good as RD in the first IPL but nowhere near RD in this IPL. RD has to make sure that he continues to contribute in rest of the matches otherwise initial 2-3 good knocks are of no use!
AK is bowling brilliantly in this series where as he was big flop in the IPL 1

Cover Point · « **Reply #108 on:** May 08, 2009, 06:34:20 PM »

Kumble has won games for his team and has been very good.

And Dravid was doing great .... until he left for India for having his baby

gouravk · « **Reply #109 on:** May 08, 2009, 08:08:47 PM »

hmm ... bangalore still have a chance to upset one or more out of DD,DC, chennai in their remaining games and then bank points against the minnows.

12th_Man · « **Reply #110 on:** May 08, 2009, 08:28:26 PM »

Quote from: ruchir on May 08, 2009, 06:11:09 PM

After all the initial hype and hurrah, which of the Indian olds have proven adequate in IPL? SRT? SG? AK? VVS? RD?

It depends whom you ask

. The names will be different.
SRT has been MOM in two of Mumbai's 9 matches. RD has been in 1 of 7 he played.
Kumble while in wickets had close call fom MOM.
SG was very close to winning a game for KKR.
VVS had his winning contribution in games he played by getting out ASAP to give Rohit a chance to accelerate.

These are the fantasy scores of each of the players that potentially sums up their contribution as well(50 bonus for MOM, scoring pattern at http://fantasy.cricinfo.com/fantasy/fantasyleague/user/scoringpoints.html?game_id=51 ):

SRT   487
Akumble   458
RD   290
SG   217
Not writing VVS's score else to save weekend depression for Rams.

poondu · « **Reply #111 on:** May 08, 2009, 08:35:19 PM »

Quote from: 12th_Man on May 08, 2009, 08:28:26 PM

Quote from: ruchir on May 08, 2009, 06:11:09 PM
After all the initial hype and hurrah, which of the Indian olds have proven adequate in IPL? SRT? SG? AK? VVS? RD?

It depends whom you ask . The names will be different.
SRT has been MOM in two of Mumbai's 9 matches. RD has been in 1 of 7 he played.
Kumble while in wickets had close call fom MOM.
SG was very close to winning a game for KKR.
VVS had his winning contribution in games he played by getting out ASAP to give Rohit a chance to accelerate.

These are the fantasy scores of each of the players that potentially sums up their contribution as well(50 bonus for MOM, scoring pattern at http://fantasy.cricinfo.com/fantasy/fantasyleague/user/scoringpoints.html?game_id=51 ):

SRT   487
Akumble   458
RD   290
SG   217
Not writing VVS's score else to save weekend depression for Rams.

Does the fantasy scores take into account the Economy rate for bowlers and Strike rate for batsmen?

12th_Man · « **Reply #112 on:** May 08, 2009, 08:36:32 PM »

Yes sir !! That is why I posted the scoring pattern.

Man of the Match
Official Man of the Match 50 Points

Batting
Run scored: 1 Points
Six runs (off one ball) bonus*: 2 Points
Dismissed for duck: -10 Points

Run rate bonus (for batsmen scoring 20 runs or more)
Between 00.00 and 49.99 runs per 100 balls: -30 Points
Between 50.00 and 74.99 runs per 100 balls: -20 Points
Between 75.00 and 99.99 runs per 100 balls: -10 Points
Between 100.00 and 149.99 runs per 100 balls: 0 Points
Between 150.00 and 179.99 runs per 100 balls: 10 Points
Between 180.00 and 199.99 runs per 100 balls: 20 Points
Above 200.00 runs per 100 balls: 30 Points

Milestone bonus
On reaching 25 runs : 10 Points
On reaching 50 runs : 20 Points
On reaching 75 runs : 40 Points
On reaching 100 runs : 80 Points

Bowling
Wicket (except dismissal of bowler**): 25 Points
Wicket (dismissal of bowler**): 10 Points
Maiden over: 40 Points
Run conceded: 0 Point

Economy rate bonus (for bowlers bowling 2 overs or more)
Between 00.00 and 02.99 runs per over: 30 Points
Between 03.00 and 04.99 runs per over: 20 Points
Between 05.00 and 06.99 runs per over: 10 Points
Between 07.00 and 08.99 runs per over: 0 Points
Between 09.00 and 10.99 runs per over: -10 Points
Between 11.00 and 13.99 runs per over: -20 Points
Above 14.00 runs per over: -30 Points

Milestone bonus
On taking 2 wickets : 10 Points
On taking 3 wickets : 20 Points
On taking 4 wickets : 40 Points
On taking 5 wickets : 80 Points

Fielding
Catch (Fielder): 15 Points
Catch (Wicketkeeper): 15 Points
Stumping: 15 Points
Run out (direct): 30 Points
Run out (indirect/per player): 10 Points

RicePlateReddy · « **Reply #113 on:** May 08, 2009, 08:42:59 PM »

Is it time for Mumbai to get more captains?

So much for the "great cricketing brain".

To be fair, he hasn't fared this poorly in his bowling prior.

15.6   Tendulkar to de Villiers, 1 run, flighted on middle, driven past the bowler down to long-on for a single, 19 off the over, failed gamble
15.5   Tendulkar to de Villiers, FOUR, absolutely terrible, Mumbai have squandered a good few overs here, short on the off, enough time for de Villiers to rock back and bludgeon that wide of deep midwicket
15.4   Tendulkar to de Villiers, no run, long hop again, was lucky it kept low, got an underedge wide of the keeper
15.3   Tendulkar to de Villiers, FOUR, poor, short, rank long hop on middle, the offspinner again, pulled away into the same gap for a boundary, the Mumbai captain has thrown it away
15.2   Tendulkar to de Villiers, SIX, that'll do it even more, poor ball, full toss on middle, smashed away over the deep-midwicket boundary, the decisive bowling change
15.1   Tendulkar to de Villiers, FOUR, superb shot, tossed up outside off, gets to the pitch and flicks it away between long-on and deep midwicket for a boundary, that'll relieve the pressure a little

12th_Man · « **Reply #114 on:** May 08, 2009, 08:51:02 PM »

Quote from: ShortSquatLeg on May 08, 2009, 08:42:59 PM

Is it time for Mumbai to get more captains?

So much for the "great cricketing brain". To be fair, he hasn't fared this poorly in his bowling prior.

15.6   Tendulkar to de Villiers, 1 run, flighted on middle, driven past the bowler down to long-on for a single, 19 off the over, failed gamble
15.5   Tendulkar to de Villiers, FOUR, absolutely terrible, Mumbai have squandered a good few overs here, short on the off, enough time for de Villiers to rock back and bludgeon that wide of deep midwicket
15.4   Tendulkar to de Villiers, no run, long hop again, was lucky it kept low, got an underedge wide of the keeper
15.3   Tendulkar to de Villiers, FOUR, poor, short, rank long hop on middle, the offspinner again, pulled away into the same gap for a boundary, the Mumbai captain has thrown it away
15.2   Tendulkar to de Villiers, SIX, that'll do it even more, poor ball, full toss on middle, smashed away over the deep-midwicket boundary, the decisive bowling change
15.1   Tendulkar to de Villiers, FOUR, superb shot, tossed up outside off, gets to the pitch and flicks it away between long-on and deep midwicket for a boundary, that'll relieve the pressure a little

This was a bone head decision, considering they needed to add more pressure rather giving DV oppurtunity.

Cover Point · « **Reply #115 on:** May 08, 2009, 08:54:10 PM »

Quote from: 12th_Man on May 08, 2009, 08:51:02 PM

Quote from: ShortSquatLeg on May 08, 2009, 08:42:59 PM
Is it time for Mumbai to get more captains?

So much for the "great cricketing brain". To be fair, he hasn't fared this poorly in his bowling prior.

15.6   Tendulkar to de Villiers, 1 run, flighted on middle, driven past the bowler down to long-on for a single, 19 off the over, failed gamble
15.5   Tendulkar to de Villiers, FOUR, absolutely terrible, Mumbai have squandered a good few overs here, short on the off, enough time for de Villiers to rock back and bludgeon that wide of deep midwicket
15.4   Tendulkar to de Villiers, no run, long hop again, was lucky it kept low, got an underedge wide of the keeper
15.3   Tendulkar to de Villiers, FOUR, poor, short, rank long hop on middle, the offspinner again, pulled away into the same gap for a boundary, the Mumbai captain has thrown it away
15.2   Tendulkar to de Villiers, SIX, that'll do it even more, poor ball, full toss on middle, smashed away over the deep-midwicket boundary, the decisive bowling change
15.1   Tendulkar to de Villiers, FOUR, superb shot, tossed up outside off, gets to the pitch and flicks it away between long-on and deep midwicket for a boundary, that'll relieve the pressure a little
This was a bone head decision, considering they needed to add more pressure rather giving DV oppurtunity.

if they had a proper coach ... they would never make such a decision

LosingNow · « **Reply #116 on:** May 08, 2009, 09:35:46 PM »

Quote from: ShortSquatLeg on May 08, 2009, 08:42:59 PM

Is it time for Mumbai to get more captains?

So much for the "great cricketing brain". To be fair, he hasn't fared this poorly in his bowling prior.

Given that part-time spinners were doing very well by slowing the pace of game - it was a 50-50 decision.. but when you bowl such bad balls - it indicates a "brain-freeze" or "trying too hard" when keeping it simple could have done the trick

broadbat · « **Reply #117 on:** May 09, 2009, 04:16:09 AM »

I think SRT should forget about captaining and just focus on his cricket. That would then leave just Dhoni and Sehwag from the original list of ,( what were they called I forget the name), of players who were supposed to be, (what were they supposed to be?) the shining lights of their teams.

broadbat · « **Reply #118 on:** May 09, 2009, 04:19:37 AM »

OK I forgot about the young prince.

kingcool1432 · « **Reply #119 on:** May 09, 2009, 04:22:25 AM »

Quote from: broadbat on May 09, 2009, 04:16:09 AM

I think SRT should forget about captaining and just focus on his cricket. That would then leave just Dhoni and Sehwag from the original list of ,( what were they called I forget the name), of players who were supposed to be, (what were they supposed to be?) the shining lights of their teams.

Dhoni's not an icon player for CSK, I think.

Related Topics
	Subject	Started by	Replies	Views	Last post
	IPL 2009 - Match 24 (KXIP vs BRC) - Match Thread Cricket Match Threads	cricket_news	92	1740	May 01, 2009, 07:00:15 PM by cricket_news
	IPL 2009 - Match 23 (KKR vs MI)-Match Thread- Mumbai look to repeat mauling Cricket Match Threads	cricket_news	120	3637	May 02, 2009, 05:22:40 PM by dextrous
	IPL 2009 - Match 25 (DC vs RR) - Match Thread Cricket Match Threads	cricket_news	112	2896	May 04, 2009, 09:00:21 PM by cricket_news
	IPL 2009 - Match 28 (MI v/s BRC) - Match Thread Cricket Match Threads	cricket_news	84	1920	May 12, 2009, 06:16:47 AM by keep-it-cool
	IPL 2009 : Match Thread (Match 42) - MI v/s KXIP General Cricket Discussion	cricket_news	36	701	May 13, 2009, 07:00:59 AM by Blwe_torch
	IPL 2009 Match Thread (Match 41) - BRC vs KKR General Cricket Discussion	cricket_news	124	2018	May 12, 2009, 05:40:41 PM by ganavk
	IPL 2009 - Match 46 -May15th- Match Thread (DD v/s PKXI) Cricket Match Threads	12th_Man	63	2493	May 15, 2009, 06:06:52 PM by Cover Point

AuthorTopic: IPL 2009 - Match 35 (DD vs MI) (Read 3618 times)