However, all said and done, crediting MSD for getting self belief into the team based on this win is too premature. Without belittling anyone else's efforts, take Veeru's innings out of the game and we would have been playing for a draw. And it is not as if MSD had any role in the way Veeru played.
I disagree.. while MSD did not have a direct role in the way Veeru played.. but I do believe that he indirectly helped the team (i.e. people like YS, GG, SRT and to some extent VS) play positive cricket. While VS setup the game, the finish was provided by GG, SRT and YS.
Huh!! GG has been playing like this irrespective of captain since the way he came back into the team.
SRT has been playing like this right from the Aussie tour
YS plays like this whenever he scores (against Pak last year when he came in at a worse time) - the only difference was his refusal to get involved in any verbal stuff with the English bowlers - which was clearly SRT's influence - else he wouldnt have done so in the first innings
Veeru has always played like this irrespective of target and captain. Moreover, even he has said that he played like this only because the English bowlers bowled very poorly.
I dont see MSD having changed any outlook as far as this chase is concerned. The batsmen delivered - simple.
I think a positive locker room atmosphere does wonders to a team's approach. It was clear from the get go, that India was not going to go "saftey first"... which has been our attitude in the past...and that rubbed the team in the right way.
That was our strategy even in the Nagpur test which Dhoni captained - safety first and let the Aussies make the play.
There have been times when we could have chased such totals if we went with a positive mindset but we did not.
For ex., in St Kitts, even when Viroo had set a nice platform, we immediately went for "safety first" - yes, the target was stiffer - but we didnt have to put the shutters down. That was clearly a defensive RD's mindset driving the team approach.
You must be joking .. if you compare the equations in St Kitts and here, you'll see how wrong you are.
The points are a) even with Veeru's innings we have played for a draw in the past, and b) in the absence of a veeru-like performance we have never encouraged positive play for fear of losing...don't tell me we Indians could not have had any positive players beside Veeru (of course, he is in a different class), it is just that we have never allowed that in the past.
Give me one instance where Veeru has played such a knock in a chase and we have not capitalised. He has generally failed - as his poor 2nd innings average suggests.
Even MSD said that without Veeru's innings, we would have been defending this match.
I think you are really underestimating the value of a positive outlook and approach. I give MSD (and the more I am reading about Kirsten, him too) a lot of credit for creating the right atmosphere and outlook in the locker room...and it is showing results.
Does this mean they will keep winning with positive outlook alone .. of course, not.. but I am fairly sure they will more this way, if they continue this approach.
I am not underestimating anything. You are overestimating & over simplifying.