im part of dhoni not getting his due either...kban clearly had an agenda when he wanted mishra to get MOM
Yeah, you are right.
The only agenda I have is I understand cricket.
MSD's 2nd innings doesnt count --thats called garbage time scoring.
So what we are left with is this
SRT - 88 at a crucial time on a batting wicket. Had India been bundled out around 250-300, we culd have kissed this test goodbye.
SG - 102. ditto.
MSD - 92 valuable runs
Among these 3 above, SRT / SG rank higher from a contribution standpoint because of the state of the match and the fact that a collapse at that stage would have spelt doom.
MSD scores points for captaincy, but I dont see them being high enough to trump the contributions of SRT / SG.
Now to the bowling. On that pitch, a 375 -425 score was always on the cards even for ateam batting 2nd. The people who didnt let that happen were the bowlers, notably Mishra, who set up the game, gaining us a 201 run lead on a batting wicket. After that killer blow, the match was set up and would have taken the most inept display from us to lose it.
So the decision from a cricketing standpoint, IMO was 1) Mishra 2) SG /SRT.
Some have argued for a switch in the rank ordering and that is their opinion --which has some substantiation to it.
But choosing MSD by statistically adding up 1st & 2nd innings totals along with captaincy would not have been my choice --the 2nd innings was flogging a dead horse while the captaincy (quite good -- BTW, I have been praising his captaincy for quite a while now, so much for agenda) was not strong enough a factor to give it to him -- he after all had the stronger hand.