Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Down

AuthorTopic: Wimbledon 2008 Thread  (Read 5665 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Please post once and this message will disappear! Introduce yourself, say hello, jump into a discussion...

Zacked

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,580
  • Money: 2224.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #160 on: July 06, 2008, 08:11:30 PM »
 brak point won at last....... ;D ;D
Logged

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #161 on: July 06, 2008, 08:11:50 PM »
15-15
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #162 on: July 06, 2008, 08:12:38 PM »
30-15
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #163 on: July 06, 2008, 08:13:12 PM »
30-30
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #164 on: July 06, 2008, 08:14:29 PM »
30-40 championship point for nadal
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #165 on: July 06, 2008, 08:15:04 PM »
WOWOWOWOW DEUCE
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #166 on: July 06, 2008, 08:15:26 PM »
backhand cross court slice
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #167 on: July 06, 2008, 08:15:48 PM »
AD IN .. CP again
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #168 on: July 06, 2008, 08:16:21 PM »
NADAL WINS!!!!!!!!!
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #169 on: July 06, 2008, 08:17:01 PM »
A MATCH TO REMEMBER FOR AGES
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

Zacked

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,580
  • Money: 2224.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #170 on: July 06, 2008, 08:17:45 PM »
YaY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Nadaaaal.............
Logged

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #171 on: July 06, 2008, 08:18:33 PM »
SPAIN dominating sports this year.. Euro and this
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

Zacked

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,580
  • Money: 2224.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #172 on: July 06, 2008, 08:19:11 PM »
A MATCH TO REMEMBER FOR AGES

The best final ive seen after the one Involving Goran and Rafter  :notworthy: :notworthy:
Logged

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,958
  • Money: 1504653.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #173 on: July 07, 2008, 05:12:19 AM »
Nadal-Federer epic the most thrilling of all the Wimbledon finals
 By Ravi Ubha
Special to ESPN.com
Updated: July 6, 2008

Sunday's Wimbledon final was one of those times when you call a buddy immediately after the match ends and say, "Did you see that?"

Hope so.

Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer battled for nearly five hours, braving the conditions and each other, before the Spaniard finally ended the Swiss's reign at the All England Club. John McEnroe, a three-time Wimbledon champ, proclaimed it was the best tennis tussle he had ever seen.

Fitting, then, that we unveil the top five most memorable Wimbledon finals in the Open era. The most recent one leads the way.


1. Rafael Nadal versus Roger Federer, 2008. Nadal wins 6-4, 6-4, 6-7 (5), 6-7 (8), 9-7

He needed four match points, but Rafael Nadal finally ended the longest men's final in Wimbledon history.
Before we talk about the actual tennis, let's throw some intangibles in there. The match began 20 minutes late due to rain and two more interruptions ensued -- one arguably helping Federer and the other favoring Nadal. Had they been on court much longer, surely bad light would have sent a third interruption for Monday.

In any case, at 4 hours, 48 minutes, it turned out to be the longest men's singles final in Wimbledon history.

The two gladiators delivered a combined 149 winners, almost double the unforced error tally, and Federer served huge when he needed to, especially in the third and fourth sets, and early in the fifth.

Nadal, though, proved how tough he is mentally. Blowing two match points in the fourth-set tiebreaker surely would have sent others downhill, but the Spaniard persevered and was impregnable on his own serve in the fifth, facing just one break point.

He held serve from early in the second set onward.

Nadal ended Federer's five-year hold on the trophy and his 65-match winning streak on grass. He probably silenced detractors, too, finally claiming a major on a surface other than clay.

"Probably later on in life, I'll go, 'That was a great match,' '' Federer said.


And he would be right.


2. Bjorn Borg versus John McEnroe, 1980. Borg wins 1-6, 7-5, 6-3, 6-7 (16), 8-6

Getting over two match points is one thing, but recovering to win after squandering five in a tiebreaker -- perhaps the greatest in Wimbledon history -- is quite another.

Bjorg Borg, the stoic and super-fit Swede, achieved the feat in 1980, downing brash upstart John McEnroe. Chasing a fifth consecutive Wimbledon crown, Borg held set points on five separate occasions in the fourth-set 'breaker before McEnroe converted on his eighth set point to make it 18-16 and send the tussle to a fifth. To make matters worse, Borg held two match points earlier in the fourth.

The tiebreaker lasted 22 minutes and Borg would later admit he thought he had no chance of taking the fifth set.

"I have never been so disappointed on a tennis court as when I lost that fourth set,'' Borg said afterwards. "Seven match points and I failed to do it. Every time I had another match point, John came up with a great shot.''

Borg kept it together in the fifth, only dropping one point in his final six service games. McEnroe gained his revenge by beating Borg in 1981, bringing to an end his reign at the All England Club.

3. Goran Ivanisevic versus Patrick Rafter, 2001. Ivanisevic wins 6-3, 3-6, 6-3, 2-6, 9-7


Rain played havoc with Wimbledon seven years ago -- should we say, more so than usual? -- and it ultimately led to one of the most memorable occasions in Grand Slam history. The men's final began on a Monday due to the precipitation, the first time that happened at Wimbledon since 1922. As a result, 10,000 tickets went on sale 2½ hours prior to the match, meaning a younger, more boisterous crowd was in attendance. And who to root for, the popular Ivanisevic, or, uh, popular Rafter?

Ivanisevic prevailed in what turned out to be the longest fifth set of a men's singles final at Wimbledon, in terms of games, at the time. In the process, he became the first men's wild card to capture a major.

Getting there was the fun part.

Ivanisevic, ranked outside the top 100 and a loser in three previous Wimbledon finals, cried, kissed the ball and jolted his left -- and serving -- arm as he tried to serve out the encounter. A service winner finally did the trick and Ivanisevic could hardly believe his Wimbledon misery was over.

"I think I'm dreaming,'' Ivanisevic said at the time. "Somebody is going to wake me up and tell me, 'Man, you didn't win.' ''

4. Venus Williams versus Lindsay Davenport, 2005. Williams wins 4-6, 7-6 (4), 9-7

Venus Williams has five Wimbledon trophies but is was her marathon final versus Lindsay Davenport that will go down as the most memorable.
The elder of the tennis playing sisters became the first ladies finalist at Wimbledon to save a match point, then go on to win, since Helen Wills Moody in 1935. Staring at defeat at 4-5, 30-40 in the third set, Venus Williams crunched a backhand that left Lindsay Davenport, who hasn't claimed a major since 2000, with no answer.

Williams had to rally once more in the third, trailing 2-4, and the two-hour, 45-minute thriller was the longest Wimbledon women's final in history.

Adding to the drama, Davenport carried on despite struggling with a back injury that surfaced in the deciding set.

"Every time the chips were down for Venus, she played unbelievably,'' Davenport said.

5. Steffi Graf versus Gabriela Sabatini, 1991. Graf wins 6-4, 3-6, 8-6

Graf had something to prove, coming off a humiliating 6-0, 6-2 loss to Arantxa Sanchez Vicario in the semifinal of the French Open weeks earlier and not winning a Grand Slam since the 1990 Australian Open, an age for her.

The final wasn't pretty -- Graf and fan favorite Sabatini were broken a combined 12 times in the second and third sets. However, there was plenty of drama.

Sabatini, who claimed her lone Grand Slam title by downing Graf at the U.S. Open 10 months earlier, turned things around by moving forward.

Twice she failed to serve out the encounter deep in the third set: At 6-5, 30-all, Sabatini hit a backhand volley that looked like a winner, but Graf chased it down and sent a winning reply, then broke and didn't lose another game.

It was the third of Graf's seven Wimbledon titles.

Ravi Ubha is a frequent contributor to ESPN.com.
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis/wimbledon08/columns/story?columnist=ubha_ravi&id=3475655
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

Shukla

  • World XI Star
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 874
  • Money: 17424.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #174 on: July 07, 2008, 06:32:13 AM »
Is the record for most consecutive wimbledon titles 5? I thought it was 6, set in 1800s.
Logged

kban1

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,964
  • Money: 1066884.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #175 on: July 07, 2008, 06:39:05 AM »
yes
 but back then the champion never played the challenge rounds -he played in the final directly
Logged

Shukla

  • World XI Star
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 874
  • Money: 17424.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #176 on: July 07, 2008, 07:20:02 AM »
yes
 but back then the champion never played the challenge rounds -he played in the final directly
ahh...thank you.
Logged

dhruvdeepak

  • Global Moderator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 13,640
  • Money: 1552944.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #177 on: July 07, 2008, 07:57:17 AM »
lost for words!!!!!

that was something special!!

wow.

i dont know if such high quality tennis has ever been displayed before. what an even match
Logged
In the attitude of silence the soul finds the path in a clearer light, and what is elusive and deceptive resolves itself into crystal clearness. Our life is a long and arduous quest after Truth.
-- Mohandas K *hi

ramshorns

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12,981
  • Money: 3865939.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #178 on: July 07, 2008, 02:48:40 PM »
lost for words!!!!!

that was something special!!

wow.

i dont know if such high quality tennis has ever been displayed before. what an even match
The 1989 Lendl-Becker semi final match at Wimbeldon which Becker won was great quality wise since you asked for high quality of Tennis.  Both these men were pretty much at top of their game at the time with contrasting styles one a born serve and volleyer in Becker and another a grinder in the Great Lendl who defied odds to make it to the Semi-Final or better at Wimbeldon his supposed weak surface an incredible 8 times.  Sampras/McEnroe/Connors/Becker/Edberg do not even come close in comparison at French their weak surface.  That is what makes Lendl a better overall Tennis player than anyone perhaps barring Borg in the last 35 or so years.

Getting back to yesterday, given the drama and what was at stake the Nadal-Federer match is right up there with the all time great matches and perhaps unmatched all things considered like Federer's streak of wanting to win 6 in a row.
Logged

pieterSAN

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,429
  • Money: 182991.00
  • Helwe
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #179 on: July 07, 2008, 03:25:55 PM »
Never mind the greatest match ever, I don't think I have seen a higher quality contest in any sport. Given the blustery conditions and the worn out courts both players were executing at highest level for nearly 5 hours and despite the interruptions.

Bravo to Nadal, I did not think he would have the courage to match Federer in the final. Great performance.
Logged
"...that is me offering you an olive basket... ...and that is you spitting in my face."

Scott Caan as Turk Malloy

ramshorns

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12,981
  • Money: 3865939.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #180 on: July 07, 2008, 03:33:56 PM »

Bravo to Nadal, I did not think he would have the courage to match Federer in the final. Great performance.
Seems to me like Nadal has Federer's number these days.  He just chokes him at the French and now with this great win seems to have made inroads on Federer's favorite surface.
Logged

kban1

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,964
  • Money: 1066884.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #181 on: July 07, 2008, 04:21:23 PM »
I think the wimbledon surfaces of late -say the last 8+ years or so has something to do with that too. makes it easier for great baseline players and retrievers to reach the ball and make  a play on it

These is hardly the surface that matches in the 70's, 80's or early 90's (except for 1 year and we know who won that year) were played on.
Logged

gouravk

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,199
  • Money: 162557.00
  • Which way will this ball swing ?
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #182 on: July 07, 2008, 04:29:35 PM »
which year was that ?
Logged
...Tvameva Vidya Dravidam Tvameva ... Tvameva Sarvam Mama Deva Deva !!

kban1

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,964
  • Money: 1066884.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #183 on: July 07, 2008, 04:32:05 PM »
1992 I believe - Agassi
Logged

vincent

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,206
  • Money: 428470.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #184 on: July 07, 2008, 05:43:04 PM »
In any case, Agassi is the only one who has won on all four grand slam surfaces in recent years after Laver, though not in the same year as Laver.

His win also demontsrated that Wimbledon court was changing along with the raquets.Previously only serve and volley players mostly won the matches (with the exception of Borg, who was versatile anyway).

As far as Federer is concerned, I DO think he needs a coach. His problem yesterday was mainly his mental strength where he was so good before. Otherwise he could have won that second set and the result would have been different.
Logged

kban1

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,964
  • Money: 1066884.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #185 on: July 07, 2008, 06:43:16 PM »
Quote
His win also demontsrated that Wimbledon court was changing along with the raquets.Previously only serve and volley players mostly won the matches (with the exception of Borg, who was versatile anyway).

True, although 1992 was an aberration in terms of the slowing courts chronology -- that year a mix of weather patterns resulted in slower courts, a fact which remedied itself in subsequent years till the recent slowdown which is more definitively a trend.
Logged

Zacked

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,580
  • Money: 2224.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #186 on: July 08, 2008, 02:26:55 AM »
As far as Federer is concerned, I DO think he needs a coach. His problem yesterday was mainly his mental strength where he was so good before. Otherwise he could have won that second set and the result would have been different.

true Nadal was down and out in the second set with Federer leading 4-1 and then Nadal won 5 consecutive games... btw Nadal is very tough physically as well as mentally.... The quality of tennis was high from the opening set itself... what a game....
Logged

dhruvdeepak

  • Global Moderator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 13,640
  • Money: 1552944.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #187 on: July 08, 2008, 06:05:07 AM »
I think the wimbledon surfaces of late -say the last 8+ years or so has something to do with that too. makes it easier for great baseline players and retrievers to reach the ball and make  a play on it

These is hardly the surface that matches in the 70's, 80's or early 90's (except for 1 year and we know who won that year) were played on.

oh i thought you meant that bugger krajicek in 96 - ruined my hero sampras' dream run.

haha his co-finalist was some malivai washington  ;D
Logged
In the attitude of silence the soul finds the path in a clearer light, and what is elusive and deceptive resolves itself into crystal clearness. Our life is a long and arduous quest after Truth.
-- Mohandas K *hi

dhruvdeepak

  • Global Moderator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 13,640
  • Money: 1552944.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #188 on: July 08, 2008, 06:08:41 AM »
lost for words!!!!!

that was something special!!

wow.

i dont know if such high quality tennis has ever been displayed before. what an even match
The 1989 Lendl-Becker semi final match at Wimbeldon which Becker won was great quality wise since you asked for high quality of Tennis.  Both these men were pretty much at top of their game at the time with contrasting styles one a born serve and volleyer in Becker and another a grinder in the Great Lendl who defied odds to make it to the Semi-Final or better at Wimbeldon his supposed weak surface an incredible 8 times.  Sampras/McEnroe/Connors/Becker/Edberg do not even come close in comparison at French their weak surface.  That is what makes Lendl a better overall Tennis player than anyone perhaps barring Borg in the last 35 or so years.

Getting back to yesterday, given the drama and what was at stake the Nadal-Federer match is right up there with the all time great matches and perhaps unmatched all things considered like Federer's streak of wanting to win 6 in a row.

apart from ystday's game the 7-6 6-7 7-6 7-6 in the '01 US Open was another match of the highest quality...(sampras and agassi)
Logged
In the attitude of silence the soul finds the path in a clearer light, and what is elusive and deceptive resolves itself into crystal clearness. Our life is a long and arduous quest after Truth.
-- Mohandas K *hi

kban1

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,964
  • Money: 1066884.00
Re: Wimbledon 2008 Thread
« Reply #189 on: July 08, 2008, 06:18:20 AM »
I think the wimbledon surfaces of late -say the last 8+ years or so has something to do with that too. makes it easier for great baseline players and retrievers to reach the ball and make  a play on it

These is hardly the surface that matches in the 70's, 80's or early 90's (except for 1 year and we know who won that year) were played on.

oh i thought you meant that bugger krajicek in 96 - ruined my hero sampras' dream run.

haha his co-finalist was some malivai washington  ;D

Oh I loved that. What a methodical demolition, mmmm

Too bad Krajicek retired due to injuries, giving pete a free run at W.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Up