Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

AuthorTopic: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate  (Read 2158 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Please post once and this message will disappear! Introduce yourself, say hello, jump into a discussion...

hastalavistababy

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,075
  • Money: 28414.00
Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« on: October 18, 2007, 04:19:08 PM »
Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate


London, October 18: The Science Museum in London has cancelled a talk by Nobel Prize winning scientist Dr James Watson after he was accused of making racist comments implying Africans were not as intelligent as whites.

Watson, who discovered the double helix structure of DNA along with Briton Francis Crick, has been condemned for saying he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours -- whereas all the testing says not really".


The 79-year-old American was due to talk at the Science Museum's Dana Centre on Friday but on Wednesday night a spokesman said Watson's comments had gone "beyond the point of acceptable debate and as a result the museum was cancelling the sold-out event, The Daily Telegraph claimed on Thursday.


The eminent American, in Britain to promote a new book, also said the assumption that different racial groups shared "equal powers of reason" was backed by "no firm reason".


However, he said people should not discriminate racially, because "there are many people of colour who are very talented."


His comments have been attacked by fellow scientists, anti-racism campaigners and politicians.


Watson has courted controversy before, saying darker-skinned people have a higher sex drive and that women should hypothetically have the right to abort foetuses that "may have a tendency to become homosexual."

« Last Edit: October 19, 2007, 02:22:01 AM by winningnow »
Logged
N=NERO, N=NANDIGRAM, N=NANDAN

keep-it-cool

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18,074
  • Money: 1714880.00
  • Thanda Thanda Kool Kool
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2007, 04:45:34 PM »
I wonder if people would have had the same problem had he said ... xyz people are not as athletic as abc people
Logged
Sachin Tendulkar gave the muhurat clap for 'Awwal Number' - that apart, he hasn't done much wrong in the last 20 yrs!

prfsr

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,754
  • Money: 39747.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2007, 05:38:26 PM »
As a scientist, he should have supplied evidence of what objective tests for intelligence he used. For one I would love to see proof that these are indeed objective. Much of the western world in fact does not use IQ tests but strongly subjective tests like SAT/GRE which are heavily biased towards people with very good knowledge of English.

Watson, as far as I know is a geneticist. Genetic proof of intelligence is something I have not heard of at all. Has anyone heard of anything like this?

-P 
Logged

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,097
  • Money: 2027386.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2007, 05:57:22 PM »
I wonder if people would have had the same problem had he said ... xyz people are not as athletic as abc people
Clearly your ideas of race and stereotyping are reflective of this scientist's and as such very much outside the realm of acceptable debate.
Logged

kban1

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,964
  • Money: 1066884.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2007, 06:41:44 PM »
This is old stuff - rehashed and in many ways rejected because of the lack of scientific finding to support the conclusions.

IQ tests as well as aptitude tests are significantly biased towards examination of verbal and mathematical / spatial skills in which people from better socio economic backgrounds tend to perform well. In the context of western society, one particular racial group figures predominantly in such economic strata therefore accounting for observations that are significantly skewed.

Read the following as espoused by the book" The Bell Curve which espoused the same theory and the criticism of that thesis:

***********************************************************************************
The Bell Curve is a controversial, best-selling 1994 book by the late Harvard professor Richard J. Herrnstein and American Enterprise Institute political scientist Charles Murray. Its central point is that intelligence is a better predictor of many factors including financial income, job performance, unwed pregnancy, and crime than parent's Socio-Economic status or education level. Also, the book argued that those with high intelligence (the "cognitive elite") are becoming separated from the general population of those with average and below-average intelligence, and that this was a dangerous social trend. Much of the controversy erupted from Chapters 13 and 14, where the authors write about the enduring differences in race and intelligence and discuss implications of that difference. The authors were reported throughout the popular press as arguing that these IQ differences are genetic, although they state no position on the issue in the book, and write in the introduction to Chapter 13 that "The debate about whether and how much genes and environment have to do with ethnic differences remains unresolved."

The conclusions made in the book are deducted from the research of others. Although Richard Herrnstein had a strong background in psychology, co-author Charles Murray was not an expert in intelligence testing, according to psychologist Leon J. Kamin [1]

The book's title comes from the bell-shaped normal distribution of IQ scores. The Normal distribution is the limiting distribution of a random quantity which is the sum of smaller, inpendent random phenomena. The message in the title is that IQ scores are Normally distributed because a person's intelligence is the sum of many small random variations in genetic and environmental factors.

Shortly after publication, large numbers of people rallied both to criticize and defend the book. Some critics denounced the book and its authors as supporting scientific racism. A number of books were written in response, to criticize The Bell Curve. Those books included The Bell Curve Debate, which contains essays that respond to the controversial issues raised in The Bell Curve.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve
Logged

Dayal Baba

  • One Day Star
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 402
  • Money: 64213.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2007, 07:02:24 PM »
what else do you expect from an atheist scientist? to be fair to him, he is probably consistent in his dogmatic beliefs.
Logged

Blwe_torch

  • Marketing Moderator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 16,004
  • Money: 3129840.00
  • My daughter.
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2007, 07:10:49 PM »
Do you think, we are all equally intelligent? ( OK, I leave myself out! :glasses3: )

Is intelligence more or less evenly distributed? ???
Logged

Aloo Kashmiri Ul Haq

  • Bismallah Rahim izzz I izzz score 15017 runs
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,098
  • Money: 44968.00
  • sekho na naino ki bhasha..
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2007, 07:24:13 PM »
Watson needs to take his ass back to Harvard and see how some of these Nigerian students kick his butt. ::) ::)
Logged
Why did the chicken cross the road?

According to Le Chatelier:
 
The chicken crossed the road because there were too many moles of chicken
on the reactants side of the road equilibrium.

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,097
  • Money: 2027386.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #8 on: October 18, 2007, 08:11:58 PM »
Do you think, we are all equally intelligent? ( OK, I leave myself out! :glasses3: )

Is intelligence more or less evenly distributed? ???

blwe,
modern theories differ--but certainly, there's no evidence that, on average, one race is more 'intelligent' than another.

but the second question that's raised is what exactly is intelligence? IQ/SAT/GMAT/etc all measure a certain kind of intelligence--linear. But most scholars now believe that there are different types of intelligence that a person can possess in various combinations.
Logged

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #9 on: October 18, 2007, 08:51:29 PM »
Do you think, we are all equally intelligent? ( OK, I leave myself out! :glasses3: )

Is intelligence more or less evenly distributed? ???
No, we are not all equally intelligent..

..but race or region or genetics is not the reason for it. Nobody has proven it, yet.

That is the point.

--
I tend to believe there is a measurement issue.. which dex is highlighting.
Also, my hypothesis is if we ever get to measure it, it will come down to the environment of person (upbringing, nurture, support, availability of resources etc.) more than anything else.
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

natty

  • Test Match Star
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Money: 37122.00
  • we will, we will rock you!
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2007, 09:33:33 PM »


Erm.. this thread demonstrates the astounding lack of knowledge here regarding this topic.


Intelligence is most certainly heritable and  differences between endogamous groups (races and micro-races that largely marry within their group) are well known (searches on scholar.google.com before making some nonsensical comeback here).. in fact aspects of cognitive ability can be selected for in astonishingly short periods of time (e.g. 1000 years).  Humans use breeding to achieve the same in much short time frame (dogs etc.). India is very interesting because it is home to thousands of micro-races and for the most part we really dont know in what interesting ways they differ.
Logged
Rude, Blunt, and Uncompromising. It's not personal.

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #11 on: October 18, 2007, 09:54:04 PM »
natty:
Thanks for posting this... can you tell us ignoramuses in plain English (rather than the scientific mumbo jumbo ;D ;D) ..what it means.
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

hastalavistababy

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,075
  • Money: 28414.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2007, 09:58:11 PM »


Erm.. this thread demonstrates the astounding lack of knowledge here regarding this topic.


Intelligence is most certainly heritable and  differences between endogamous groups (races and micro-races that largely marry within their group) are well known (searches on scholar.google.com before making some nonsensical comeback here).. in fact aspects of cognitive ability can be selected for in astonishingly short periods of time (e.g. 1000 years).  Humans use breeding to achieve the same in much short time frame (dogs etc.). India is very interesting because it is home to thousands of micro-races and for the most part we really dont know in what interesting ways they differ.

nobel prize for natty.  <Edited by CV Mods>
« Last Edit: October 18, 2007, 10:08:16 PM by CricketvoiceMods »
Logged
N=NERO, N=NANDIGRAM, N=NANDAN

Cover Point

  • Cover Point
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,525
  • Money: 2594333.00
  • Cover Point
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2007, 10:16:00 PM »


Erm.. this thread demonstrates the astounding lack of knowledge here regarding this topic.


Intelligence is most certainly heritable and  differences between endogamous groups (races and micro-races that largely marry within their group) are well known (searches on scholar.google.com before making some nonsensical comeback here).. in fact aspects of cognitive ability can be selected for in astonishingly short periods of time (e.g. 1000 years).  Humans use breeding to achieve the same in much short time frame (dogs etc.). India is very interesting because it is home to thousands of micro-races and for the most part we really dont know in what interesting ways they differ.

nobel prize for natty.  <Edited by CV Mods>

I would have loved to see what he wrote :)
Logged
Busting Gangulian chops since eternity.

natty

  • Test Match Star
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Money: 37122.00
  • we will, we will rock you!
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2007, 11:02:14 PM »
First off, Watson made politically incorrect remarks and will take a lot of flak for it..  Differences between races is not his speciality area but he definitely has the ability to understand what is out there and, given his age, say whats he wants to say.

Now there has been always a tension over the nature vs. nurture idea.. and of course the answer is that nature sets the upper and lower limits and nurture decides where exactly one lands up.. Steven Pinker's "The Blank Slate" covers this tension (I havent read it though)

Now most of us believe (I certainly do) that there is a good chance that Agassi and Steffi's son will be a decent sportsman, maybe has a chance of achieving the same level as his parents if he is pushed in that direction.  Look at Yuvraj.. A fine athlete and definitely has to thank his parents (both India class sportspersons).  In unidimensional sports (running 100 m or marathon or shot put) genetics will rule supreme as it is likely that some groups have some favorable trait selected for in their history (there is a tribe in Kenya that produces middle distance champions like nobody's business).   In multidimensional sports where there is more than one way to excel, racial genetics isn't quite as constraining (one can have different racial types do well by optimizing on their strengths)  but still can play a big part at the highest levels.

Similarly we have seen many instances of closely related folks who excel in some field or the other.  My own daughter is an example.. She is very sharp (of course I take all credit for this) but I seriously dont believe I had anything do with this in terms of coaching her or whatever (she can thank our ancestors collectively, I guess). My  brothers are pretty sharp as well and so is our father. And we went to very bad schools (before college) and our parents never cared about what we did in school (I came close to flunking high school).  Some of my cousins are also very sharp and (unlike me) have actually translated that into real results.   Of course I suck at many intellectual things as well (spatial ability is bad) and I can blame some genetics luck of the draw (recall that our genes are random shuffle of our parents) for that as well (in my case).  However my daughter struggles to do pull ups (I  also fail at this while one of my brothers was good at this) in her school..  She can do the rest of the stuff (situps, running) just fine.. Maybe our group simply doesnt have the body structure to do what it takes to do pull ups (on average).  If I train with weights, I dont get muscular that easily.. But some others do. Why?  The nurture is the same but the result is different. When the Aussies inevitably throw well, they are leveraging their strengths (of course they must train for it but same amount of training wont make Indians equally good throwers unless one selects for exceptionally good athletes who also have cricketing talents.. tough to find..)

 So I am guessing that somehow the group we belong to selected for reproduction in such a way (say over the last 2000 years) so that intellectually sharp folks had a greater chance to reproduce (which means the culture rewarded such activity or somehow made survival easier for such folks).  This hypothesis has been advanced for the Ashkenazi Jews who were not known for their intellectual prowess before Christ but something about their situation changed the genetics of the group.  The authors of this paper suggest that these people were marginalized in European societies and the only jobs they could do was stuff like Money Lending  which also required intellect (keeping accounts, tabs, ability to write stuff down).   A successful moneylender is likely to marry and re-marry (if wife dies) and produce kids..   And in this endogamous group, intelligence became selected for (along with some heritable diseases as well which correlate with intelligence).    Current consensus is that endogamy is a good thing provided you marry beyond your second cousin (third cousin or farther).. in most Indian groups, this has been followed (although in some we have dangerous practices like uncle-niece marriages)

How were dog breeds created? By interbreeding dogs that had the desired traits over and again so that after n generations you had at one end a pomeranian and at the other a st bernard.. these pure dog breeds are really freaks created by humans applying selection on steroids (and with these traits these breeds also were vulnerable in various ways).  The same thing happens when cultures apply selection (indirectly) as in the case of Jews.  Now an American commentator was fired in the 1980s when he suggested that slave owners in America used their studs (strong slaves) to father kids (next generation of slaves) with the result that some percentage of african americans are exceptionally strong etc.  This suggestion is very controversial but it could be true (I havent checked) if the more successful slaves got more chances to have kids (and slaves who were largely west african did have physical structure for running sprints etc).

I dont think these racial differences are good or bad. They just are.  Of course with intermarriage they do diminish.. African Americans have on average maybe 20% white blood (sometimes a lot more, approaching 80% or more in case of Colin Powell).. Take Andrew Symonds.. He is supposed to black but if one does a genetic analysis he is probably more european than african. 

My own interest (theoretical since I havent done anything about it) is based on the fact that Indians have practiced endogamy for generations (caste) and there are thousands of these groups (micro-races, if you will).  Now its very likely that these various groups were subject to some common and some differing selection pressures (i.e. what is good for one group may not always be good for the other in terms of survival and reproduction) and result in a variety of talents being distributed across these groups.  When I think of a caste like the Weavers or Moneylenders, surely they must differ in very interesting ways.   And given our culture of admission tests and what not, it is not surprising that banias (agarwals, marwaris) and like groups do very well possibly because they have some traits that are advantageous for cognitive tasks.  But maybe for creative things like coding (yes you need some minimum intelligence) maybe the Weavers will do pretty well despite not doing as well on general tests of intelligence which school and college entrance exams test. So yes, it would not surprise me if there is a 2 Standard Deviation difference in mean general intelligence (this is a monstrous difference) between two groups at polar extremes in a country as diverse like India (some no-name tribe and a group like the Parsis). This is an unavoidable consequence of the statistics of distributions.   

Intelligence and types of intelligences are not the only trait of interest.. There are the physical traits and the temperamental aspects or personality traits (hot headed, docile, even-tempered, etc.) along which groups can differ too.  These too are heritable and should be expected to differ across endogamous groups.

I should mention that Africa is the genetically most diverse and the genetically most isolated continent.   The different african groups differ more from each other than do different European groups.  So it would not be surprising to find differences between these african groups and tribes on various traits.  But extant research does suggest that there is at least a 1 SD difference between the means on various measure of intelligence between a wide variety of african groups and european groups. This finding is pretty solid.  Also the east asian groups have higher intelligence than the European groups as a whole (especially on spatial ability). 

« Last Edit: October 18, 2007, 11:25:38 PM by natty »
Logged
Rude, Blunt, and Uncompromising. It's not personal.

ROSSIKE

  • Spectator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
  • Money: 1000.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #15 on: October 19, 2007, 01:45:46 AM »
Erm.     .       Mr Natty or whatever you call yourself, do you really think you can come on here and spread these dubious ''studies'' conducted by some idiot white men with not an African in sight?

You really expect any ''intelligent'' person to believe your inherently biased analysis or ''findings''?

I'm a Nigerian, and I certainly disagree with your conclusions, having first hand seen my countrymen whoop white ass intellectually on several fields of interraction, from school, to university to workplace.      In fact one study of academic performance in the UK recently put African students at the top and Bangladeshis at the bottom.       Where does that leave your theory?

I'm not so daft as to assume that this means Africans are more intelligent than Bangladeshis or anyone else - it could be any number of reasons that accounts for their success, just as in other areas or environments, some extraneous reason or the other may account for underachievement.          

The minute you introduce your 'spatial ability studies' and all that rubbish, you simply show you've lost control of your senses.          

And now that I'm fired up, can I thrown in one last question?

If whites are so intelligent why did it take you 7,000 years to emerge from the caves, when Africa represented by the then black civilizations of Egypt, Nubia and Kush were
 begging your people to come and learn to read and write, and you chased them away with clubs and brutish scowls?

And then when finally, the truth hit you, men who later became your 'Greek philosophers' now entered Egypt/Ethiopia, were taught the 'Mysteries' by black Africans, which you later (out of greed and hate) used against them, armed yourselves to the teeth and drove their people southwards?

Every West African people have a tradition of migration from the great River in antiquity.          

Europeans, after invading Egypt and destroying high African civilization, now went about defacing the monuments, testaments to African ingenuity, by sawing off the noses, and scraping the lips off the artefacts, because, as Louis Farrakhan once said, ''it reminded you too much of the black man's majesty''.          

freemaninstitute.     com/Gallery/Egyp095_150pixBest_copy.     jpg
The Sphinx as it looks today

freemaninstitute.     com/images/Sphinx_drawing_best_cropped.     jpg
This is what Vivant Denon saw in 1798 before the Sphinx was defaced.          

In his written account Denon stated, "Though its proportions are colossal, the outline is pure and graceful; the expression of the head is mild, gracious, and tranquil; the character is African, the mouth, and lips of which are thick, has a softness and delicacy of execution truly admirable; it seems real life and flesh.      Art must have been at a high pitch when this monument was executed.        " -- Universal Magazine, 1803.        

Even a cursory research of the ancient sources reveals that:

All those who say that the Ancient Egyptians were Black:

The Ancient Egyptians 

The Ancient Greeks

  Herodotus
  Aristotle
  Lucian
  Apollodorus
  Aeschylus

The Ancient Romans

  Strabo
  Diodorus of Sicily
  Diogenes Laertius
  Ammanius Marcellinus

France

  Count Constatine de Volney
  Marius Fontanes - "Les Egyptes"

England

  EW Budge (finally, reluctantly) - "Keeper of the Egyptian and Assyrian Antiquities,
  British Museum"

The Anzac troops upon arriving in Egypt during WWI and finding ancient artefacts:
  "My God, we didn't know the Egyptians were niggers!"
  hxxp: www.      dnzb.      govt.      nz/dnzb/default.      asp?Find_Quick.      asp?PersonEssay=3B39

Africa
  Professor C.      A.       Diop
  Professor Theophile Obenga
  Dr Chancellor Williams

The Christian Bible

The Kebra Nagast (Ethiopian bible)

The Tanakh (Torah)

The Koran


All those who say that the Ancient Egyptians were not Black:

White Egyptologists

And maybe the National Geographic Channel, their media misrepresentation outlet.   

.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .    

So there.     Your lies have been exposed even in your misrepresentation of the history of those who taught you civilization.     

So Mr Natty, rather than peddling your silly theories deriding those whom you in fact, should be worshipping for introducing you to civilization, I suggest you find ways to rid your new western civilization of the debilitating, ignorant racism, and stultefying greed that threatens to rent us all asunder.        

 
Kindest Regards.          
« Last Edit: October 19, 2007, 02:25:28 AM by ROSSIKE »
Logged

feverpitch

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,325
  • Money: 893426.00
  • Lachchha Porotta drops a dung cake
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #16 on: October 19, 2007, 02:09:25 AM »
Folks, please read the book : Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature, authored by evolutionary geneticist Richard Lewontin, neurobiologist Steven Rose and psychologist Leon J. Kamin. A fascinating book that debunks all such racial theories of evolution.
Logged
"In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all life presents as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived has moved away into a representation."

Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #17 on: October 19, 2007, 02:18:21 AM »
Wow. Rossike..

Interesting post. Would love to understand your background and what brings you to this DG. I assume your interest in cricket.

Welcome to the DG.
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

natty

  • Test Match Star
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Money: 37122.00
  • we will, we will rock you!
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #18 on: October 19, 2007, 02:22:10 AM »
Mods

I am quite surprised that someone registered in this forum merely to flame these opinions of mine which apparently are very disturbing.   I am guessing he is spreading his vitriol based on the watson brouhaha (given that the poster is from England this seems plausible) and am confident his harangues would have spread far and wide in the blogosphere (a search on google would suffice)

This forum is meant for cricket lovers and not for others to pollute.  I dont think we should encourage such threads here (if this is the kind of riff raff we attract)

-------
Europeans, after invading Egypt and destroying high African civilization, now went about defacing the monuments, testaments to African ingenuity, by sawing off the noses, and scraping the lips off the artefacts, because, as Louis Farrakhan once said, ''it reminded you too much of the black man's majesty''.   
-------

Go to some other forum and peddle your horse manure.  Farrakhan indeed!

To the new poster:  The elite africans who migrate on their volition to western countries are not representative of their populace.  The "facts" that you peddle here do not have any basis (the greeks learnt all their stuff from Africa.. please). Please provide proper citations in refereed journals.  Also I did mention (if you were not clueless) that Africans have the greatest diversity in terms of tribes and groups (Pygmies are very different from Zulus, East Africans are very different from West Africans, and so on).




« Last Edit: October 19, 2007, 02:27:05 AM by natty »
Logged
Rude, Blunt, and Uncompromising. It's not personal.

kban1

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,964
  • Money: 1066884.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #19 on: October 19, 2007, 02:26:42 AM »
natty:

aside from the measurement issues that dextrous and I have touched on, how does your thesis apply to a whole group of people like africans as the thread originally reports ?

We know intelligence is heritable. We also know  (as you stated) that among groups and sub groups, certain socially enforced natural selection can take place that affects intellectual proclivities.

As to how this can be generalized to entire white population vs entire black / African population escapes me because there is no support for this.

Also, even taking the socially enforced natural selection theory into account, this is likely to affect subsets of the white population as well as sub sets of the non white population. I shall grant you that the white population probably has been less unfavorably constrained in this regard given that the economic and social power has been in their hands for the last several centuries but differences between sub groups within races hardly allows for broader widescale extrapolation.

Finally, to bring in the measurement bias, is it not likely that measurement of one type of intelligence and that too using standards and scales more amenable to one group of the population is likely to result in differential results ? The issue of measurement bias when it comes to intelligence is very clearly laid out too.
Logged

kban1

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,964
  • Money: 1066884.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #20 on: October 19, 2007, 02:31:46 AM »
Rossike & Natty:

A sincere request --

Let us keep the discussion civil -- even opposing points can be discussed without getting personal. It is meant to be an academic discussion, there is no point getting angry over this.
Logged

natty

  • Test Match Star
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Money: 37122.00
  • we will, we will rock you!
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #21 on: October 19, 2007, 02:56:51 AM »
kban: 

Obviously both white and black are crude categories.. but they are sufficiently distinct to be separated into two categories that are meaningful.  Most Indians (including the dark skinned dravidians) squarely fall into the caucosoid group although if we go to the east (even parts of bengal) there are folks with mongoloid features.  Races are similar to sub-species.

Excluding some weird island groups and australian aborigines, there are 3 broad groups (caucasoids, negroids, and mongoloids) that have been geographically segregated for tens of thousands of years.. About 100 k years ago a small group of humans from africa migrated to Europe (migration may have taken thousands of years)..  Later there was a second split to groups that moved to east asia..  and of course in shorter time scales there have been many migrations.. Most of India is populated by migrants (of course in most cases the migrants came over 1000 years back)

Regarding the differences.. these are based on a variety of tests (first conducted by US Military).. and for over 80 years there has been a consistent 1.1  standard deviation difference in the mean (that doesnt exclude brilliant africans such as our new poster who isnt that brilliant).. As I mentioned before the african americans arent completely african.. many of them are also european to differing degrees.  If you visit university campuses you will see that a good percentage of AAs who get admitted (on academics) have some european or even asian features.  In fact asian+african combos should be quite rare but these kids are vastly over-represented in US campuses

If we consider Africans in Africa there have been several contemporary studies of black-white differences in elite South African universities.  All these kids come from well-to-do families and there is this same type of difference.  Maybe the Nigerians are among the smartest Africans? (although surely the Ethiopians and Kenyans would also be in this group?).  The reputation of Nigeria as the home of many scams does add to their reputation as scamming requires social smarts which is probably not tapped by intelligence and generally academic testing.

About intelligence testing..  No other measurement has come anywhere close to the predictive validity of intelligence tests.  While these tests (and proxies such as the SAT etc) have different sub-components.. these have high positive correlations.. So there appears to be a common underlying factors that contributes to various intelligences or talents.   Statistically it is possible to extract the "g" factor from a collection of tests.  It turns out those tests that load highly (similar) to the overall "g" factor also show the highest heritability (in twin studies where one twin is adopted) and the most consistent differences between races and are a definite candidate in the race to find out the genes involved in brain development that matter to the development of cognitive ability.  There have been a lot of efforts to find stable measures of intelligence that are independent of g and matter to outcomes but this search has not been fruitful (people like Howard Gardner talk about multiple intelligences and while it sounds great in theory to have a musical intelligence thats independent of math ability, thats not the case in reality.. kids who are good in music also seem to have some general pattern recognition ability that helps them in math as well)

General intelligence depends on biological parameters such as myelination which can enhance speed of neuronal conduction and a bunch of other factors.  Factors that screw up this biology (bad diet) can reduce intelligence considerably..  So it is possible that some of the low scores seen in sub-saharan countries can be improved by better diet but even after that one should see the 1 SD difference..   The Japanese and Koreans (and maybe Chinese) score higher than Whites who invented these tests in the first place (although China has had civil service exams for a long time)

Now the success of a society does depend on the average IQ (see IQ and the wealth of nations by some Finnish authors) but equally it depends on their ability to co-operate.   A group with average IQ but high degree of co-operation will outperform a high-IQ group but with less co-operation.. In reality these factors are highly related as shown in a recent study where students in ivy league colleges showed a lot more co-operation in prisoner dilemma games (this was a meta analysis).    I think a group like this are the Gujjus in the US who have more or less taken over the motel industry.  Not Einsteins but have an amazing ability to work as a community.. So this group intelligence thing cannot be underestimated either. 

One interesting question is: Will communication and technology exacerbate differences between groups or bring them together.. As far as I can tell, the only way to make the world one amorphous mass of people is to have random inter-marriage (and even then it might not work).


Logged
Rude, Blunt, and Uncompromising. It's not personal.

ROSSIKE

  • Spectator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
  • Money: 1000.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #22 on: October 19, 2007, 02:58:47 AM »
Quote from: natty link=topic=13229.         msg162986#msg162986 date=1192760530
Mods

I am quite surprised that someone registered in this forum merely to flame these opinions of mine which apparently are very disturbing.            I am guessing he is spreading his vitriol based on the watson brouhaha (given that the poster is from England this seems plausible) and am confident his harangues would have spread far and wide in the blogosphere (a search on google would suffice)

This forum is meant for cricket lovers and not for others to pollute.        

What is a 'cricket lover' doing positing poisonous racist claptrap about Africans?

Quote
I dont think we should encourage such threads here (if this is the kind of riff raff we attract)

Believe you me, if I go and call my forum crowd into this debate, you'll see far more 'riff raff' and mentalness than you've ever seen in your entire life.          So be careful not to irritate me further.        

Quote
-------
Europeans, after invading Egypt and destroying high African civilization, now went about defacing the monuments, testaments to African ingenuity, by sawing off the noses, and scraping the lips off the artefacts, because, as Louis Farrakhan once said, ''it reminded you too much of the black man's majesty''.           
-------

Go to some other forum and peddle your horse manure.           Farrakhan indeed!

Well then sir, why were all the artefacts defaced?     Any ideas? Why are all the noses on the pharoahs blown off?  Why are the thick lips scraped off?   So you can continue to deceive the world on National Geographic with the pale-skinned, white images of your racist imaginations?

How long do you think you can continue to fool the world?

Quote
To the new poster:  The elite africans who migrate on their volition to western countries are not representative of their populace
.          

Aah.    There we have it.     So the 'elite Africans' show brilliance because they are more intelligent than the 'non-elite' Africans? Elite = intelligence in your Natty conception.        

Why is anyone bothering with this guy?


Quote
The "facts" that you peddle here do not have any basis (the greeks learnt all their stuff from Africa.         .          please).          Please provide proper citations in refereed journals.           Also I did mention (if you were not clueless) that Africans have the greatest diversity in terms of tribes and groups (Pygmies are very different from Zulus, East Africans are very different from West Africans, and so on).        

You see, all this your 'tribes' this and 'pygmies' that simply betrays your ignorance, and your unsuitability to comment on African affairs.          Callously referring to ethnic groups comprising millions of people as ''tribes'' is enough to disqualify YOU from any informed discourse about Africa.          We reject your categorisation of Africans in such ignorant, condescending terminology.        

As for your request for 'proof' that Greeks learnt from Egypt.          I'll leave you with this highly informative article by Professor Asante, filled with references which you are free to look up in your spare time.          Regards.        


 
An African Origin of Philosophy: Myth or Reality?
By Molefi Kete Asante
(First Published in City Press, July, 2004)

There is a common belief among whites that philosophy originates with the Greeks.          The idea is so common that almost all of the books on philosophy start with the Greeks as if the Greeks pre-dated all other people when it came to discussion of concepts of beauty, art, numbers, sculpture, medicine or social organization.          In fact, this dogma occupies the principal position in the academies of the Western world, including the universities and academies of Africa.   It goes something like this:

Philosophy is the highest discipline.        
All other disciplines are derived from philosophy.        
Philosophy is the creation of the Greeks.        
The Greeks are white,
Therefore, whites are the creators of philosophy.        

In the view of this dogma, other people and cultures may contribute thoughts, like the Chinese, Confucius, but thoughts are not philosophy; only the Greeks can contribute philosophy.          The African people may have religion and myths, but not philosophy, according to this reasoning.          Thus, this notion privileges the Greeks as the originators of philosophy, the highest of the sciences.        

There is a serious problem with this line of reasoning.          The information is false.          As far as scholarship can reveal the origin of the word philosophy is not in the Greek language, although it comes into English from the Greek.          According to dictionaries on Greek etymology the origin of the word is unknown.          But that is if you are looking for the origin in Europe.          Most Europeans who write books on etymology do not consider Zulu, Xhosa, Yoruba, or Amharic, when coming to a conclusion about what is known or unknown.          They never think that a term used by a European language may have come from Africa.        
There are two parts to the word philosophy as it comes to us from the Greek, “Philo” meaning brother or lover and “Sophia” meaning wisdom or wise.          Thus, a philosopher is called a “lover of wisdom.         ”

The origin of “Sophia” is clearly in the African language, Mdu Ntr, the language of ancient Egypt, where the word “Seba,” meaning “the wise” appears first in 2052 BC in the tomb of Antef I, long before the existence of Greece or Greek.          The word became “Sebo” in Coptic and “Sophia” in Greek.          As to the philosopher, the lover of wisdom, that is precisely what is meant by “Seba,” the Wise, in ancient tomb writings of the Egyptians.        

Diodorus Siculus, the Greek writer, in his On Egypt, written in the first century before Christ, says that many who are “celebrated among the Greeks for intelligence and learning, ventured to Egypt in olden times, that they might partake of the customs, and sample the teachings there.          For the priests of Egypt cite from their records in the holy books that in the former times they were visited by Orpheus and Musaeus, Melampos, Daedalos, besides the poet Homer, Lycurgus the Spartan, Solon the Athenian, and Plato the philosopher, Pythagoras of Samos and the mathematician Eudoxos, as well as Democritus of Abdera and Oenopides of Chios, also came there.         ”

Obviously many Greeks who learned philosophy ventured to Africa to study.          They came for many intellectual reasons.          One can see that the Greeks appreciated the fact that in Egypt were men and women of great skill and knowledge just as the Egyptians appreciated the fact that there were men and women of greater knowledge in Ethiopia.        

According to Herodotus, writing in the 5th Century BC in Book II of History, the Ethiopians said that the Egyptians were nothing but a colony of Ethiopians.          Of course, today there remains an entire system of disbelief about the history, experiences, and knowledge of the people of Africa, created during the past five hundred years of European conquest.          A rhetoric of denial of Africa’s capability was developed to accompany the dispossession of Africa.          This was done to go along with the European conquest of Africa, Asia, and America.          Colonization was not just a land issue, it was an issue of colonizing information about the land.          Yet I am of the opinion that the ancients knew better than the contemporary pundits about the importance of non-Africans studying in Africa.        

There was no Germany, France, England, Italy, United States, or Spain to speak of when the Greeks started to travel to Africa for their studies.          Indeed, they went to Africa and after they went back to Greece created the Greek Golden Era.          It was not before, but after they had studied in Egypt that these people got some advanced training.          What I am saying is that they had to come to Africa and study with the wise men of ancient Egypt, who were black, in order to be able to learn medicine, mathematics, geometry, art, and so forth.          This was long before there was any European civilization.        

Why did the Greek philosophers study in Africa? Thales, the first Greek philosopher and the first who is recorded to have studied in Africa, says that he learned philosophy from the Egyptians.          They studied in Egypt because it was the educational capital of the ancient world.          Pythagoras is known to have spent at least twenty two years in Africa.          One could get a fairly good education in twenty two years, perhaps even earn a Ph.         D.         ! The Greeks were seeking the philosophical information that the Africans possessed.          When Isocrates wrote of his studies in the book Busirus, he said that “I studied philosophy and medicine in Egypt.         ” He did not study these subjects in Greece in Europe, but in Egypt in Africa.        

Not only is the word philosophy not Greek, the practice of philosophy existed long before the Greeks.          Imhotep, Ptahhotep, Amenemhat, Merikare, Duauf, Amenhotep, son of Hapu, Akhenaten, and the sage of Khunanup, are just a few of the African philosophers who lived long before there was a Greece or a Greek philosopher.        

When the Africans finished building the pyramids in 2500 BC it would be one thousand seven hundred years before Homer, the first Greek writer, appears!

And when he appears and begins to write The Iliad he does not spend much time before he is writing about what happened in Africa or what was happening in Africa.          The Greek gods were meeting in Ethiopia.          Homer is said to have spent seven years in Africa.          What could he have learned in those classes with those wise teachers? He could have learned Law, philosophy, religion, astronomy, literature, politics, and medicine.        

Africans did not wait for the Greeks to figure out how to construct the pyramids.          Can you see the Egyptians standing around at the stone quarries or on the banks of the Nile in 2500 BC speculating on when some European would come alone and help them measure the earth, calculate width, breadth, and depth, determine the exact helical rising of Serpet (Sirius) and the inundation of the Nile, or diagnose the diseases of the human body.        

According to Herodotus, in Histories, Book II, the Colchians were Egyptians “because like the Egyptians they had black skin and wooly hair.         ” Aristotle says in Physiognomonica that “the Egyptians and Ethiopians are very black.         ”

Led by the Pharaoh of African History, Cheikh Anta Diop, a new cadre of scholars has emerged to challenge all of the lies that were told about Africa and about Africans.          They are the ones who, as the poet Haki Madhubuti says, walk toward fear, not away from it.          They are the real standards for courage and commitment.         

At a major 1974 conference sponsored by UNESCO on the “Peopling of Egypt” in Cairo, two blacks, Diop and Theophile Obenga, walked toward fear and when they had finished presenting their papers they had shattered all of the lies that were told about Africans.          Using science, linguistics, anthropology, and history, these two intellectual giants demonstrated that the ancient Egyptians were black They used a melanin test on the skin of a mummy, art from the walls of tombs, correspondences to other African languages, and the testimonies of the ancients.        

It is so interesting to me that the ancient Greeks knew much better than the current crop of Europeans who pontificate on the subject that the ancient Egyptians, long before the coming of the Greeks, Romans, Arabs, and Turks to Egypt, were Africans, indeed, black-skinned Africans.        

Aristotle, the philosopher, wrote in his book, Physiognomonica, that “the Ethiopians an Egyptians are very black.         ” Herodotus adds that the ancient Egyptian had “black skin and wooly hair.         ”

The color of the ancient Egyptians should not matter; it only comes up because one always finds some white person who is dedicated to the proposition that Africans could not have built the pyramids, and especially not black Africans.          Of course, everyone should know that the Egyptians were Africans, but the fact is that they were not just Africans, these particular Egyptians were black skinned with woolly hair.        

Philosophy begins first with the black skinned people of the Nile Valley around 2800 BC, that is, 2200 years before the appearance of Thales of Miletus, considered the first Western philosopher.   30,000 years ago our ancestors were separating red ochre from iron in a Swaziland cave.  They had to have some idea about what they were doing.    There had to be some reflection, some process by which the elders determined what was to be used for what and on what occasion.  Thus, even before writing, we have evidence that Africans were engaging in meaningful discussions about the nature of their environment.        

Molefi Kete Asante is one of the most published contemporary scholars, having written more than sixty books and three hundred articles.        

Scholarly Papers | Book/Film Reviews | Newspaper/Magazine Articles

Copyright © 2005 by Asante & Associates

« Last Edit: October 19, 2007, 03:26:40 AM by ROSSIKE »
Logged

natty

  • Test Match Star
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Money: 37122.00
  • we will, we will rock you!
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #23 on: October 19, 2007, 02:58:58 AM »
Folks, please read the book : Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature, authored by evolutionary geneticist Richard Lewontin, neurobiologist Steven Rose and psychologist Leon J. Kamin. A fascinating book that debunks all such racial theories of evolution.

Lewontin got some of his fundas wrong. I am not a geneticist but can dig this up. But then no one here will follow the technical details.

Ah here is the gist of why Lewontin's ideas turned out to be wrong:


Turning to race, we must begin with the fraught question of whether it even exists, or whether it is instead a social construct. The Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin originated the idea of race as a social construct in 1972, arguing that the genetic differences across races were so trivial that no scientist working exclusively with genetic data would sort people into blacks, whites, or Asians. In his words, “racial classification is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance.” (25)

Lewontin’s position, which quickly became a tenet of political correctness, carried with it a potential means of being falsified. If he was correct, then a statistical analysis of genetic markers would not produce clusters corresponding to common racial labels.

In the last few years, that test has become feasible, and now we know that Lewontin was wrong. (26) Several analyses have confirmed the genetic reality of group identities going under the label of race or ethnicity. (27) In the most recent, published this year, all but five of the 3,636 subjects fell into the cluster of genetic markers corresponding to their self-identified ethnic group. (28) When a statistical procedure, blind to physical characteristics and working exclusively with genetic information, classifies 99.9 percent of the individuals in a large sample in the same way they classify themselves, it is hard to argue that race is imaginary.

Homo sapiens actually falls into many more interesting groups than the bulky ones known as “races.” (29) As new findings appear almost weekly, it seems increasingly likely that we are just at the beginning of a process that will identify all sorts of genetic differences among groups, whether the groups being compared are Nigerian blacks and Kenyan blacks, lawyers and engineers, or Episcopalians and Baptists. At the moment, the differences that are obviously genetic involve diseases (Ashkenazi Jews and Tay-Sachs disease, black Africans and sickle-cell anemia, Swedes and hemochromatosis). As time goes on, we may yet come to understand better why, say, Italians are more vivacious than Scots.

source: "The Inequality Taboo" google for the article
« Last Edit: October 19, 2007, 04:26:19 AM by natty »
Logged
Rude, Blunt, and Uncompromising. It's not personal.

natty

  • Test Match Star
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Money: 37122.00
  • we will, we will rock you!
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #24 on: October 19, 2007, 03:00:36 AM »
Rossike & Natty:

A sincere request --

Let us keep the discussion civil -- even opposing points can be discussed without getting personal. It is meant to be an academic discussion, there is no point getting angry over this.

kban: I'd be happy to debate Rossike on the merits of the English ODI renassiance :-)
Logged
Rude, Blunt, and Uncompromising. It's not personal.

natty

  • Test Match Star
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Money: 37122.00
  • we will, we will rock you!
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #25 on: October 19, 2007, 03:03:55 AM »
Rossike

You are a smart guy.. Why waste your time here if your interest isnt in cricket?  We are mainly a cricket forum and the other stuff is incidental.  Frankly our expertise in these areas is quite limited.

I have some suggestions for you where you can pit your smarts against worthy opponents and you will be read by a much broader and more influential audience.

http://www.gnxp.com

http://isteve.blogspot.com

Also this is what Watson actually said in his interview:

He says that he is “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”, and I know that this “hot potato” is going to be difficult to address. His hope is that everyone is equal, but he counters that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”. He says that you should not discriminate on the basis of colour, because “there are many people of colour who are very talented, but don’t promote them when they haven’t succeeded at the lower level”. He writes that “there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so”.



« Last Edit: October 19, 2007, 03:12:37 AM by natty »
Logged
Rude, Blunt, and Uncompromising. It's not personal.

ROSSIKE

  • Spectator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
  • Money: 1000.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #26 on: October 19, 2007, 03:40:59 AM »
Quote from: natty link=topic=13229.    msg162995#msg162995 date=1192763035
Rossike

You are a smart guy.    .     Why waste your time here if your interest isnt in cricket?  We are mainly a cricket forum and the other stuff is incidental.      Frankly our expertise in these areas is quite limited.   

I don't see my response to your racism as a ''waste of time, Mr''.     If you promote such  nonsense on the web - even on a cricket forum - you WILL be challenged by knowledgeable people.    

Quote
I have some suggestions for you where you can pit your smarts against worthy opponents and you will be read by a much broader and more influential audience.   

hxxp: www.    gnxp.    com

hxxp: isteve.    blogspot.    com

Thanks.     there are loads of sites where these things are discussed.     One cannot be on all of them though one tries.     Thanks for your concern.   

Quote
Also this is what Watson actually said in his interview:

He says that he is “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”, and I know that this “hot potato” is going to be difficult to address.     His hope is that everyone is equal, but he counters that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”.     He says that you should not discriminate on the basis of colour, because “there are many people of colour who are very talented, but don’t promote them when they haven’t succeeded at the lower level”.    He writes that “there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically.     Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so”.   

Watson's rantings are inconsequential in light of the truth of human history and accomplishments - and Africa's elite place in it - as enunciated above.   

I think he needs to read more widely.   



« Last Edit: October 19, 2007, 03:46:01 AM by ROSSIKE »
Logged

natty

  • Test Match Star
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Money: 37122.00
  • we will, we will rock you!
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #27 on: October 19, 2007, 04:34:11 AM »
Watson's rantings are inconsequential in light of the truth of human history and accomplishments - and Africa's elite place in it - as enunciated above.   

I will pass on your message to Dr. Watson.   Holmes, err I mean Crick, must be turning in his grave.  Indeed it is remarkable that the impressive achievements of  African civilizations were achieved without a written script.  Absolutely out of this world and quite comparable to our Indian ancestors who flew air vehicles (cf. pushpaka vimana) and conducted wars using neutron bombs (cf. brahma-astra).    All the best in your efforts to educate the unwashed masses.  I remain very impressed.
Logged
Rude, Blunt, and Uncompromising. It's not personal.

ROSSIKE

  • Spectator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
  • Money: 1000.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #28 on: October 19, 2007, 04:49:21 AM »
Quote from: natty link=topic=13229.  msg163004#msg163004 date=1192768451
Quote from: ROSSIKE link=topic=13229.  msg162997#msg162997 date=1192765259
Watson's rantings are inconsequential in light of the truth of human history and accomplishments - and Africa's elite place in it - as enunciated above.     

I will pass on your message to Dr.   Watson.     Holmes, err I mean Crick, must be turning in his grave.    Indeed it is remarkable that the impressive achievements of  African civilizations were achieved without a written script. 

Erm.  .   I can't believe I just read that.   Ever heard of hieroglyphics?
 

Damn. .  
Logged

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,097
  • Money: 2027386.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #29 on: October 19, 2007, 06:34:51 AM »
Watson's rantings are inconsequential in light of the truth of human history and accomplishments - and Africa's elite place in it - as enunciated above.   

I will pass on your message to Dr. Watson.   Holmes, err I mean Crick, must be turning in his grave.  Indeed it is remarkable that the impressive achievements of  African civilizations were achieved without a written script.  Absolutely out of this world and quite comparable to our Indian ancestors who flew air vehicles (cf. pushpaka vimana) and conducted wars using neutron bombs (cf. brahma-astra).     All the best in your efforts to educate the unwashed masses.  I remain very impressed.

WTF?!

And Noah built a ship with every animal...right. Jesus died for my sins. Let's find proof from mythological stories to discredit Africans.
Logged

Dayal Baba

  • One Day Star
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 402
  • Money: 64213.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #30 on: October 19, 2007, 07:19:10 AM »
Erm.. this thread demonstrates the astounding lack of knowledgehere regarding this topic.

with such language, you should not complain if you get flamed.

the "rationalist" assumption here is that a human being is without a soul and can be reduced to nuts and bolts and things like intelligence can be "measured". hehehe how more stupid can it get?
Logged

natty

  • Test Match Star
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Money: 37122.00
  • we will, we will rock you!
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #31 on: October 19, 2007, 02:10:09 PM »
Watson's rantings are inconsequential in light of the truth of human history and accomplishments - and Africa's elite place in it - as enunciated above.   

I will pass on your message to Dr. Watson.   Holmes, err I mean Crick, must be turning in his grave.  Indeed it is remarkable that the impressive achievements of  African civilizations were achieved without a written script.  Absolutely out of this world and quite comparable to our Indian ancestors who flew air vehicles (cf. pushpaka vimana) and conducted wars using neutron bombs (cf. brahma-astra).     All the best in your efforts to educate the unwashed masses.  I remain very impressed.

WTF?!

And Noah built a ship with every animal...right. Jesus died for my sins. Let's find proof from mythological stories to discredit Africans.

sarcasm is lost in this group..
Logged
Rude, Blunt, and Uncompromising. It's not personal.

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,097
  • Money: 2027386.00
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #32 on: October 19, 2007, 03:52:16 PM »
Watson's rantings are inconsequential in light of the truth of human history and accomplishments - and Africa's elite place in it - as enunciated above.   

I will pass on your message to Dr. Watson.   Holmes, err I mean Crick, must be turning in his grave.  Indeed it is remarkable that the impressive achievements of  African civilizations were achieved without a written script.  Absolutely out of this world and quite comparable to our Indian ancestors who flew air vehicles (cf. pushpaka vimana) and conducted wars using neutron bombs (cf. brahma-astra).     All the best in your efforts to educate the unwashed masses.  I remain very impressed.

WTF?!

And Noah built a ship with every animal...right. Jesus died for my sins. Let's find proof from mythological stories to discredit Africans.

sarcasm is lost in this group..

Year earlier posts on race must have gotten me confused. But then again, you actually believe in the Aryan invasion deal with the dravidians and migrants and what not.
Logged

RicePlateReddy

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,700
  • Money: 938436.00
  • Chamat song
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #33 on: October 19, 2007, 05:26:32 PM »
If you read Watson's interview, one can be miffed and even call him bigoted. But this media circus underway with institutions and labs suspending him (from whatever capacity he served) is a joke. The heads of institutions can issue statements that they disagree with his conclusions, but this moral policing is utterly hypocritical, IMO. The US and England need to take real steps to address the issues black people face, than some eyewash suspension of a person like Watson to show their supposed concern.

Logged
I balance, I weave, I dodge, I frolic, and my bills are all paid. On weekends, to let off steam, I participate in full-contact origami. Years ago I discovered the meaning of life but forgot to write it down. - (thanks, Hugh Gallagher)

feverpitch

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,325
  • Money: 893426.00
  • Lachchha Porotta drops a dung cake
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #34 on: October 20, 2007, 02:29:19 PM »
Folks, please read the book : Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature, authored by evolutionary geneticist Richard Lewontin, neurobiologist Steven Rose and psychologist Leon J. Kamin. A fascinating book that debunks all such racial theories of evolution.

Lewontin got some of his fundas wrong. I am not a geneticist but can dig this up. But then no one here will follow the technical details.

Ah here is the gist of why Lewontin's ideas turned out to be wrong:


Turning to race, we must begin with the fraught question of whether it even exists, or whether it is instead a social construct. The Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin originated the idea of race as a social construct in 1972, arguing that the genetic differences across races were so trivial that no scientist working exclusively with genetic data would sort people into blacks, whites, or Asians. In his words, “racial classification is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance.” (25)

Lewontin’s position, which quickly became a tenet of political correctness, carried with it a potential means of being falsified. If he was correct, then a statistical analysis of genetic markers would not produce clusters corresponding to common racial labels.

In the last few years, that test has become feasible, and now we know that Lewontin was wrong. (26) Several analyses have confirmed the genetic reality of group identities going under the label of race or ethnicity. (27) In the most recent, published this year, all but five of the 3,636 subjects fell into the cluster of genetic markers corresponding to their self-identified ethnic group. (28) When a statistical procedure, blind to physical characteristics and working exclusively with genetic information, classifies 99.9 percent of the individuals in a large sample in the same way they classify themselves, it is hard to argue that race is imaginary.

Homo sapiens actually falls into many more interesting groups than the bulky ones known as “races.” (29) As new findings appear almost weekly, it seems increasingly likely that we are just at the beginning of a process that will identify all sorts of genetic differences among groups, whether the groups being compared are Nigerian blacks and Kenyan blacks, lawyers and engineers, or Episcopalians and Baptists. At the moment, the differences that are obviously genetic involve diseases (Ashkenazi Jews and Tay-Sachs disease, black Africans and sickle-cell anemia, Swedes and hemochromatosis). As time goes on, we may yet come to understand better why, say, Italians are more vivacious than Scots.

source: "The Inequality Taboo" google for the article

Could you kindly find a different source than this Charles Murray [the author of the "The Inequality Taboo"], whose claim to fame seems to be his long term employment at the American Enterprise Institute, as well as his book, "The Bell Curve". I mean, I am generally against shooting the message with the messenger, but I hope DGians will allow me to draw a line for a guy who counts the following as his close colleagues: John R. Bolton, Newt Gingrich, David Frum, Michael Ledeen, Allan Meltzer*, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz... a veritable rogue's gallery of neo-con ideologues; as opposed to a chair holder at Harvard University that is (late) Prof Lewontin... I mean, I have no problems with you, dear natty, in your wining and dining with the devil... but can you blame others of being verrrrry wary of you and the company you keep?
 ::Whip:: ;)


*co-founder of 'monetarism' along with Milton Friedman.

PS: I will await your debunking of Prof Steven Rose, Prof Leon Kamin and others (you can add Prof Steven Jay Gould into the mix) in your future posts — using the rants by the usual suspects at AEI/Brookings Institute/PNAC. Someday, when I have time and energy, I will take on the message too. But I don't believe I need to. The wider public understands the difference between a failed academic @ a neocon institute and a highly feted one at the premier universities of this world. As Upton Sinclair said, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
« Last Edit: October 21, 2007, 12:32:55 AM by feverpitch »
Logged
"In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all life presents as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived has moved away into a representation."

Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle

feverpitch

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,325
  • Money: 893426.00
  • Lachchha Porotta drops a dung cake
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #35 on: October 21, 2007, 12:34:19 AM »
If you read Watson's interview, one can be miffed and even call him bigoted. But this media circus underway with institutions and labs suspending him (from whatever capacity he served) is a joke. The heads of institutions can issue statements that they disagree with his conclusions, but this moral policing is utterly hypocritical, IMO. The US and England need to take real steps to address the issues black people face, than some eyewash suspension of a person like Watson to show their supposed concern.

Watson lived by the sword [he is one of the most media savvy scientists around]... he died by it...
Logged
"In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all life presents as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived has moved away into a representation."

Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle

feverpitch

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,325
  • Money: 893426.00
  • Lachchha Porotta drops a dung cake
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #36 on: October 21, 2007, 12:37:47 AM »
Mods

I am quite surprised that someone registered in this forum merely to flame these opinions of mine which apparently are very disturbing.   I am guessing he is spreading his vitriol based on the watson brouhaha (given that the poster is from England this seems plausible) and am confident his harangues would have spread far and wide in the blogosphere (a search on google would suffice)

This forum is meant for cricket lovers and not for others to pollute.  I dont think we should encourage such threads here (if this is the kind of riff raff we attract)

-------
Europeans, after invading Egypt and destroying high African civilization, now went about defacing the monuments, testaments to African ingenuity, by sawing off the noses, and scraping the lips off the artefacts, because, as Louis Farrakhan once said, ''it reminded you too much of the black man's majesty''.   
-------

Go to some other forum and peddle your horse manure.  Farrakhan indeed!

To the new poster:  The elite africans who migrate on their volition to western countries are not representative of their populace.  The "facts" that you peddle here do not have any basis (the greeks learnt all their stuff from Africa.. please). Please provide proper citations in refereed journals.  Also I did mention (if you were not clueless) that Africans have the greatest diversity in terms of tribes and groups (Pygmies are very different from Zulus, East Africans are very different from West Africans, and so on).

Try reading "Black Athena" by Martin Bernal...
Logged
"In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all life presents as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived has moved away into a representation."

Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle

feverpitch

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,325
  • Money: 893426.00
  • Lachchha Porotta drops a dung cake
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #37 on: October 21, 2007, 12:39:51 AM »
I wonder if people would have had the same problem had he said ... xyz people are not as athletic as abc people

Oh yeah they would. Remember Larry Summers and his comment on women and physical prowess? He has been finally forced to resign recently. Good riddance!
Logged
"In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all life presents as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived has moved away into a representation."

Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle

feverpitch

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,325
  • Money: 893426.00
  • Lachchha Porotta drops a dung cake
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #38 on: October 21, 2007, 12:43:30 AM »
Erm.. this thread demonstrates the astounding lack of knowledge here regarding this topic.

Intelligence is most certainly heritable and  differences between endogamous groups (races and micro-races that largely marry within their group) are well known (searches on scholar.google.com before making some nonsensical comeback here).. in fact aspects of cognitive ability can be selected for in astonishingly short periods of time (e.g. 1000 years).  Humans use breeding to achieve the same in much short time frame (dogs etc.). India is very interesting because it is home to thousands of micro-races and for the most part we really dont know in what interesting ways they differ.

Dear Prof Nutty,

Thanks for enlightening our group of stupid bozos... without you, we'd have had to suffer inside the frog's well for eternity!
Logged
"In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all life presents as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived has moved away into a representation."

Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle

feverpitch

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,325
  • Money: 893426.00
  • Lachchha Porotta drops a dung cake
Re: Africans not as intelligent as whites: Nobel laureate
« Reply #39 on: October 22, 2007, 02:27:02 AM »
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/steven_rose/2007/10/the_wrong_diagnosis.html

The wrong diagnosis

The scientist James Watson ought to get his targets more clearly in his sights before firing off more of his characteristic bile.

Steven Rose

October 17, 2007




For a clever man, James Watson is remarkably loose-tongued. He always was, and age does not wither him, nor custom stale his less than infinite variety. In the UK to publicise his new book, he has been in characteristic form. In the Sunday Times, it was that long-exploded racist claim that "Africans" are inherently less intelligent than "us".

"Us" in this context seems to mean white males, as he has been equally disparaging about females in the past. And then, in yesterday's Education Guardian, he takes on schizophrenia:

    "I've no time for the Steven Rose types, who argue that schizophrenia is caused by the stresses of capitalist society ... I've hated them for years."

Well, thanks, Jim; it's nice to know where one stands. However, you ought to get your targets more clearly in your sights before you fire off. First, I've never said or believed anything so silly. Second, and more important, as you would know if you read the literature, "schizophrenia" is at best a very complex entity. There are psychiatrists who would insist that there is no such thing, rather a spectrum of conditions and problems. Some have even argued that it is disappearing.

Although there is a strong tendency for the diagnosis to run in families, it fits no clear genetic pattern and claims about the identification of predisposing genes have so far not been verified. Furthermore, schizophrenia is overwhelmingly a working-class diagnosis and, in the UK today, more frequent in black British people and especially in the children of black-white relationships. These complexities defy simplistic explanations, whether "environmental" or "genetic" (an unhelpful dichotomy which I have always opposed) and it does nothing to help the understanding or the treatment of people diagnosed with schizophrenia for molecular biologists, however eminent, to sound off so casually.


////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////


http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/steven_rose/2007/10/watsons_bad_science.html

Watson's bad science

Let's hope the widespread censure of the well-known molecular biologist will prove the death knell of scientific racism.

Steven Rose

October 21, 2007



In my blog earlier this week, I was responding to James Watson's gratuitous attack on me and my alleged views on schizophrenia in Education Guardian. At that point I hadn't seen in detail - although many of the commentators on my blog obviously had - Watson's disgraceful remarks about differences between African and Euro-American intelligence. It was these that sparked the real firestorm. Within a day, the BNP had puffed them on their website. Black and anti-racist groups responded vigorously, as did Ken Livingstone's office. The Science Museum cancelled his sell-out lecture, making it clear that his remarks had gone "beyond the limit of acceptability". Now the rest of the lecture tour has been cancelled, Watson has been suspended from his post as chancellor of Cold Spring Harbor laboratory in the US - his working base for nearly 40 years (and perhaps not coincidentally for many years the home of the American eugenics movement). And he has made an unreserved apology for, and retraction of, his quoted statements about differences in intelligence between Africans and Euro-Americans, published in today's Independent. It is clear, however, that the circumstances and content of his original remarks made it inevitable that his book-signing and lecture tour would be cancelled.

There are two separate issues to be unpicked here, on the "science" and on "freedom of speech". So far as the first goes, if Watson had confined himself to saying (as he now does in his article) that there are likely to be genes which, expressed during development, contribute to differences in individual intellectual performance, then there would be no scientific dissent, even though such genes remain to be discovered, and we may have grave doubts about the status of such measures of intellectual performance as IQ tests.

What is scientifically untenable - and indeed scientifically meaningless - is to claim that average differences in intelligence, as measured by IQ scores between different population groups, are caused by genetic differences between those groups - the core thesis of pseudoscientific racism. As for freedom of speech, these freedoms are and must be constrained. We don't have the right to casually cry fire in a crowded theatre, or to use hate speech - at least in Europe, as opposed to the US. Watson's now retracted remarks came into these unacceptable categories. So the repercussions are to be welcomed. If even one of the world's most distinguished scientists, speaking with the authority of a Nobel prize, is not allowed to get away with such racist assertions, maybe this shameful episode will prove to be a final nail in the coffin of the long and inglorious history of scientific racism.
Logged
"In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all life presents as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived has moved away into a representation."

Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up