To me, we still had the game on hand with 46 required of 4 overs. It was stupid to go after Vettori at that stage when he was bowling so well. Even worst case, we had played a maiden over without losing wickets, Pathan and KaKaDi could have got 46 of the next 3 bowled by Bond/Gillespie/Oram.
46 in 3 overs while chasing!!!
Yes.. not impossible!!
--
IMO, YS + AA + SS overs cost us the game. MSD should have bowled AA straight through in his first spell.. he was in rythm. YS was overbowled one over. HS and RPS bowled beautifully today.
Still we lost the chase in the middle overs.. we went too defensive for 3-4 overs...after losing VS/RU in successive overs.
One thing about this 20-20 game.. 2-3 overs will make the difference .. as opposed to 5-6 in ODIs... got to be on the toes all the way!
see bowling you cant do anything about except strategy - once the guy is selected he is going to have to bowl. and you have to accept that people are going to go for runs. the toss is sort of not that important anymore it seems.
with AA - perhaps he could have bowled straight out. but i had the feeling he was in for a massive pummeling all day. he got hit for a huge 6 in his 2nd over, and the order of the day was to bring in the spinners. right after AA's 2nd over, pathan was brought on, and next over it was bhajji - who got a wicket. he wanted to keep pathan on rather than bowl AA i feel, so that is fair enough. but it is a mistake to make AA bowl in the last 3-4 overs. he is poor
i agree that YS got an over too many - probably should have brought on Pathan. but that didnt decide the match for me.
not with the start we got in the chase. even after 2 wickets fell, the reqd rate was only 8 odd! very do-able with 8 in hand. so it was okay to consolidate. first it was a huge mistake to bring in Uthappa at 76-1 in 6. then uthappa also fell immediately, so it was 115 needed in 13.4 overs, with 8 wickets in hand! you dont have to go hammer and tongs. that is not how this game is played.
if you lose a wicket immediately after losing 2 wckts the game is over, because you are losing your key hitters. so a few quiet overs (it was actually 20 runs off 3.3 overs before gambhir hit a 6) was not hte problem for me. 81 needed in 8 was gettable. so was 59 in 6. even with pathan and kkd it was 46 in 4, just needed some wits to see that the fast bowlers were there and could be hit, and not vettori.
and to lose both pathan and kkd in the same over? ridiculous. especially since the ball before kkd got out he was dropped. again that was a stage where 6 had been scored off the over, he could have taken a single and waited for the next over where either patel who is an inferior spinner would bowl, or gillespie who he could play his optimal game against.