Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

AuthorTopic: US Open - 2007  (Read 1551 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Please post once and this message will disappear! Introduce yourself, say hello, jump into a discussion...

pipsqueak

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,603
  • Money: 1000.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #40 on: September 06, 2007, 01:17:57 AM »
Chakvetadze .. Sania killer .. is in the semis

apparently, each time she has beaten Sania in a tournament, she has gone on to win the tournament!
Logged

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #41 on: September 06, 2007, 01:19:33 AM »
Jankovic vs Venus ON.. now 1 set all. 4-3 Jankovic. Good match
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #42 on: September 06, 2007, 01:27:17 AM »
Big service game by Venus...to tie it at 5-5
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #43 on: September 06, 2007, 01:40:28 AM »
6-6..tie break.
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #44 on: September 06, 2007, 01:50:10 AM »
Venus wins it..

Roddick vs Federer starting at 10PM EDT !!!!
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #45 on: September 06, 2007, 02:14:36 AM »
Andre Agassi's key to a Roddick upset.. serve hard and make that first serve count. If you get involved in 6 shot rallies with Federer.. you might as well hit the 6th shot into the crowds...cant win those against Fed ;D
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

keep-it-cool

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18,074
  • Money: 1714880.00
  • Thanda Thanda Kool Kool
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #46 on: September 06, 2007, 05:06:41 AM »
NEXT PLEASE!! Who is going to stop this guy??

Federer ousts Roddick in straight sets 
Associated Press, Updated 9 minutes ago   STORY TOOLS:                         

http://msn.foxsports.com/tennis/story/7192956

NEW YORK (AP) - To Andy Roddick's credit, he played nearly flawlessly against Roger Federer, serving brilliantly, returning well, too, and giving tennis' top player a tough time.
 
To Roddick's dismay, it all added up to yet another loss.

In a match as tight as could be for 2½ sets, Federer was barely better on the most important points and emerged to edge Roddick 7-6 (5), 7-6 (4), 6-2 in the quarterfinals, moving two victories away from a fourth consecutive U.S. Open title.

Both came out wearing black shirts and shorts, Roddick adding a baseball cap, and Federer his trademark bandanna. The outfits matched and so did the level of play, right down until late in the third set, when Federer finally earned his first break points — allowing him to improve to 14-1 against Roddick over their careers.

This rematch of last year's U.S. Open final was hardly the mismatch one might have expected.

"I tried to hang in there," Federer said. "It was a tough match, I thought. Andy was serving out of a tree."


 U.S. Open 
 
 


 
Results:

Day 10: Venus wins|Federer too

Day 9: Henin ousts Serena|Men

8: Men/Women | 7: Men|Women

6: Men|Women | 5: Men|Women

4: Men|Women | 3: Men|Women

2: Men|Women | 1: Men/Women

Others:

Notebook: Nighttime is big time

Analysis:

Cronin: Tough test for Roddick

Cronin: Sharapova's weak mindset

Photo gallery:


Latest shots...
 
 



 
 
That's for sure.

Banging serves consistently up to 146 mph, Roddick hit 14 aces and didn't have a single double-fault. Then again, Federer came up with 15 aces, also never double-faulted, and erased the only break point he faced, in the second set.

Both played remarkably cleanly, combining for 90 winners (48 for Federer) and only 42 unforced errors (18 for Federer).

It came down to those two tiebreakers.

With Federer ahead 5-4 in the first one, Roddick smacked a 130 mph serve that Federer got back. Roddick charged the net behind a good approach shot, but Federer flicked a cross-court backhand passing winner, leaving the American cursing.

At 6-5, Federer hit a 122 mph ace and slowly punched the air to celebrate while Roddick muttered to himself.

It was almost the same in the second tiebreaker. At 4-4, Roddick unleashed a 140 mph serve, and Federer conjured up a backhand return that put the ball right at the opposite baseline. Roddick couldn't handle it, and two points later, Federer's 128 mph service winner put him ahead by two sets — and sent many in the partisan crowd streaming for the exits.

Federer earned his first break points all evening at 3-2 in the third set. Roddick erased the first with the help of a fortuitous net-cord bounce, and he laughed a bit at his luck while trudging back to the baseline. Seconds later, his expression was far more downcast as he missed a backhand long, for the first break by either player.

Federer broke again to end the match and extend his own record by getting to a 14th consecutive Grand Slam semifinal. That's where he will meet No. 4 Nikolay Davydenko — against whom Federer is 9-0.

"I've got a pretty good record against him. Never lost," Federer said. "But let's not get ahead of ourselves."

Well, let's, if only for a moment. Should he defeat Davydenko on Saturday, Federer would add to another of his own records by making a 10th straight major final. And a victory Sunday would not only make Federer the first man since the 1920s to win the American Grand Slam four years running, it would give him 12 Grand Slam titles overall — only Pete Sampras, with 14, won more.

Davydenko, while at the center of tennis' betting probe, reached the semifinals at Flushing Meadows for the second consecutive year by beating No. 10 Tommy Haas 6-3, 6-3, 6-4 earlier Wednesday, then again denied any involvement with gamblers and offered an explanation of what he thinks led to the red flags last month.

"I don't care what's happening out there," Davydenko said, referring to the investigation. "For me, it's more important what I do right now here."

A British online gambling company voided all bets on Davydenko's match against 87th-ranked Martin Vassallo Arguello in Poland in early August, after $7 million was wagered — 10 times the usual amount. Most of the money backed Arguello, even after Davydenko won the first set; the match went to a third set, and Davydenko quit with a foot injury.

His theory: Someone had inside information that he'd been hurting, and thought, "Sell all your houses and everything, you know, to win some money."

The Russian said his manager and the ATP are working to schedule a meeting with investigators.

He might be able to set that aside for the moment, but he won't be able to get around this: His semifinal opponent will be No. 1 Roger Federer. Davydenko never has won a match against Federer, going 0-9.

Davydenko still hasn't lost a set, the only man in the tournament who can boast of that. Even Federer already had dropped two before facing Roddick.

Haas, who also lost to Davydenko in last year's Open quarterfinals, was coming off consecutive five-set victories, including against No. 6 James Blake. So perhaps the German was a tad tired. He certainly was tired of trying to figure out Davydenko.

"Every time I tried to do something different or fight my way out of it," Haas said, "he came up with an answer."

Haas grew more than a little frustrated.

When he missed a forehand volley to get broken and fall behind 4-3 in the first set, Haas flung his racket into the net. Then he picked up his equipment and whacked it against the net post. Not quite done, Haas sat down for the changeover, threw a towel, then yanked off his white baseball cap and slammed it into a nearby chair.

In the second set, Haas got into an argument with chair umpire Carlos Bernardes over a line call, yelling, "You understand what I'm saying? Don't overrule it late. Be quicker! Be quicker!"

advertisement
 
 STORY TOOLS:                         
 
print   
send   
blog     LIKE THIS STORY?
 
   
 
There was more, including when Davydenko's backhand winner earned a service break in the match's next-to-last game. Haas grabbed a ball and smacked it into the stands, drawing a warning from Bernardes.

Still at it late, Haas spiked his racket again in the final game. Two points later, the match was over, and it was Davydenko's turn to swat a ball into the stands in celebration. He was so on-target on Wednesday that he broke Haas's serve eight times and finished with 42 winners and 19 unforced errors.

"He came up with the goods today," Haas said. "I don't know how he does it. You wonder sometimes."

That type of scintillating play is really nothing new for Davydenko — part of the reason so many questions were raised when so much money was wagered against him in a match against someone so far down in the rankings.
Logged
Sachin Tendulkar gave the muhurat clap for 'Awwal Number' - that apart, he hasn't done much wrong in the last 20 yrs!

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,097
  • Money: 2027386.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #47 on: September 06, 2007, 06:24:41 AM »
dont forget paes is in mixed-doubles finals--tomorrow.

its a treat to watch paes still. one of the best net players in the history of doubles.
Logged

keep-it-cool

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18,074
  • Money: 1714880.00
  • Thanda Thanda Kool Kool
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #48 on: September 06, 2007, 07:21:28 AM »
What was Sania's partner in mixed doubles wearing?? Would be fun to watch ladies tennis in 6-8 years time, the way the outfits are progressing.
Logged
Sachin Tendulkar gave the muhurat clap for 'Awwal Number' - that apart, he hasn't done much wrong in the last 20 yrs!

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #49 on: September 06, 2007, 10:20:30 AM »
Must say the Roddick vs Fed match was top-class tennis.. but as the article says..when it mattered, Fed just raised his game for exactly those moments. Poor Roddick, he gave his best stuff but somehow Fed had that another gear that he could switch to, when he needed.. it must be really disheartening.
Fed's combination of talent, skill and timing is plain amazing.
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #50 on: September 06, 2007, 09:50:17 PM »
Paes/Shaughnessy behind Azarenka/Mirnyi in mixed doubles finals.
4-6, 6-6..6-6 in tiebreaker. 4 set points saved by A/M

Match is live on USA,now.

..and they lose the set 7-6.. after leading 6-2 in tie-break.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2007, 09:53:03 PM by losingnow »
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,097
  • Money: 2027386.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #51 on: September 07, 2007, 02:24:46 AM »
dont forget paes is in mixed-doubles finals--tomorrow.

its a treat to watch paes still. one of the best net players in the history of doubles.
did you guys see paes play today?

abs. sublime at the net. his partner had a bad day today but watching leander play is something else. brought back memories of davis cup.
Logged

poondu

  • Marketing Moderator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,937
  • Money: 589613.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #52 on: September 07, 2007, 04:23:43 AM »
Missed Paes in action day.

I saw the Djokovic match today. Djokovic's impersonation of Sharapova and Rafa was hilarious.
Logged

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #53 on: September 08, 2007, 04:27:12 PM »
Ferrer vs Djokovic ON now
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #54 on: September 08, 2007, 06:39:59 PM »
Djokovic wins it.. 6-4,6-4, 6-3. At 20 yrs 110 days the youngest to make grand slam finals after borg and pete. The first serbian to do so, as well.

He beat Federer at Montreal !!
---
'Motivation is bigger than ever' for Roger Federer
Bonnie Ford (ESPN)

NEW YORK -- He is maddening, he is admirable, and these days, Roger Federer is admirably maddening in his ability to impose his will on an entire sport.

As Federer sword fights his way toward a fourth straight U.S. Open championship and seemingly inevitable 12th Grand Slam title, there are times when it resembles fiction -- perhaps a scene from the "Lord of The Rings" trilogy, when Aragorn, his similarly rakish hair flying in battle mode, wades into an army of orcs and slays dozens of them without being dinged. It's not true to life, but Federer does it anyway, with no help from computer-generated imagery.

Federer's recent biography by Swiss journalist Rene Stauffer is subtitled "Quest for Perfection." Those whose job it is to chronicle Federer's evolution are currently on a different quest -- the quest for fresh adjectives to describe him.

"What we're seeing right now is unprecedented in men's tennis -- the level of his dominance in these matchups in the top 10," said commentator and four-time Grand Slam winner Jim Courier. "Right now, to think that the No. 4 player in the world is 0-and-9 against him, and the No. 5 player is 1-and-14, is just scary."

Since the 26-year-old Federer is literally peerless, a critical part of anyone's game plan against him now is simply avoiding utter competitive despair, Courier said.

"I see a lot of doubt that's been well-earned by Roger, that he's created with his racket and his results," Courier said. "There's a high level of frustration and a sense of defeat. But sometimes a professional athlete's job is to not accept reality. You have to be in denial."

Still, Federer's contemporaries have recalibrated their expectations, not only for a given match, but for what they can hope to accomplish in the next few seasons.


"It's still a long way to the first place of the world even though I'm third in the world," 20-year-old Serbian sensation Novak Djokovic said after defeating Federer in the final of the Rogers Cup in Montreal last month. "I can't exactly say that I'm thinking about becoming a No. 1 next year [or] in two years."


Djokovic, who could face Federer in the final here in Flushing Meadows, and Argentina's Guillermo Canas are the only two men to have beaten Federer on the hard courts this season. Federer's routine humbling of the rest of the field for the past few years raises the old, petulant question about whether excellence is boring.

You have to go back to the 2004 French Open to find the last time Roger Federer did not reach the semifinal of a Grand Slam.

One person who remains notably riveted is Federer himself. That's part of his secret. The fact that Rafael Nadal has Federer's number on clay in general and in the French Open in particular helps keep Federer interested, but he also doesn't mind mowing down a few patsies in early rounds.

"I think he likes to win easily," said biographer Stauffer, who has known Federer since the world No. 1 was a teenager. "I see him now economizing the way he wins, waiting three or four games and then doing what's necessary to get the [service] break he needs.

"His motivation is bigger than ever. It's something astonishing for me. He's talking now about trying to play until he's 35. He's not really driven by records -- he just can't get enough of tennis. He stays up late and watches other guys playing on TV. He's really just a tennis nut."

If anyone's eyes glaze over at the thought of Federer carrying on for nearly another decade, maybe it's just a matter of looking at the landscape through a different filter.

Remember not so long ago when everyone was predicting doom for the men's game because it was all about thermonuclear serves and short points? People called that boring, too. Now elite players are lining up to take their best shot at Federer, and they've had to raise and diversify their games to do that. Without Federer, would Andy Roddick have tried to come out of his comfort zone and hone his volleying? Would Nadal be gunning for a Wimbledon title?

"He's made everybody better -- just not good enough to beat him," said Tennis Magazine senior editor Tom Perrotta.

--
There's really not a game plan against him. Just got to go out there and hope you're playing out of your mind.

--John Isner
--

A smart young player with a big serve like newly minted pro John Isner, who pickpocketed a set off Federer in their third-round match, will surely benefit from that pressure.

"There's really not a game plan against him," Isner remarked afterward. "Just got to go out there and hope you're playing out of your mind."

Isner was understandably in happy-to-be-there land. But if he wants to progress as a pro, he'll figure out that it pays to walk onto the court knowing what he wants to do and having the will to execute it, as Roddick demonstrated the other night.

"I would have loved to hear Jimmy Connors' speech to Andy before that [quarterfinal] match, because whatever it was, it must have been incredibly effective," Courier said.

"What would I have said? Be remorseless, have conviction in your points, let them fly and see where they fall. He's a superior player, but he's still human and he'll have off days."

Not many lately. One measure of Federer's near-hypnotic grip on the game was in evidence Thursday night even though he was nowhere near Arthur Ashe Stadium.

Djokovic had just finished entertaining the crowd after his quarterfinal win with his uproarious slapstick impersonations of Nadal and Maria Sharapova. A reporter wanted to know whether there was anyone he thought he couldn't mimic.

"Well, the untouchable one, Roger," Djokovic said. "He's too perfect for my style. I cannot."

So don't resent Federer. He can't help it if he's beautiful.

Bonnie D. Ford is a frequent contributor who is covering the U.S. Open for ESPN.com
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #55 on: September 08, 2007, 07:23:12 PM »
Davydenko up 3-1 against Federer in set #1.
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #56 on: September 08, 2007, 07:50:32 PM »
...and predictably, Fed wins 4 games in a row to go up 5-3

Oh wow, Davydenko breaks Fed.. and it is 5-4.

Good tennis on display here. Watch it guys
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #57 on: September 08, 2007, 08:04:49 PM »
Fed takes first set 7-5
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #58 on: September 08, 2007, 09:31:31 PM »
Fed wins in straight sets... 7-5, 6-1, 7-5.

He is incredible.

 :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,097
  • Money: 2027386.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #59 on: September 08, 2007, 11:07:16 PM »
Fed wins in straight sets... 7-5, 6-1, 7-5.

He is incredible.

 :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:
let's not forget there isn't a single other player playing right now who can will have any claims to greatness in any other era...this is really quite smooth sailing. even sampras didn't have it this easy.
Logged

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #60 on: September 09, 2007, 03:12:47 AM »
Fed wins in straight sets... 7-5, 6-1, 7-5.

He is incredible.

 :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:
let's not forget there isn't a single other player playing right now who can will have any claims to greatness in any other era...this is really quite smooth sailing. even sampras didn't have it this easy.
I am not so sure.. he is having it easy because he is just such a better player. His competition is playing very good tennis.
The quality of tennis played by Davydenko and Roddick was top class. Also, when he beat Nadal at Wimbledon, Nadal played wonderful tennis.
IMO, this guy is just damn good...both skills and mental strength wise.
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,097
  • Money: 2027386.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #61 on: September 09, 2007, 03:27:36 AM »
Fed wins in straight sets... 7-5, 6-1, 7-5.

He is incredible.

 :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:
let's not forget there isn't a single other player playing right now who can will have any claims to greatness in any other era...this is really quite smooth sailing. even sampras didn't have it this easy.
I am not so sure.. he is having it easy because he is just such a better player. His competition is playing very good tennis.
The quality of tennis played by Davydenko and Roddick was top class. Also, when he beat Nadal at Wimbledon, Nadal played wonderful tennis.
IMO, this guy is just damn good...both skills and mental strength wise.

I don't consider Davydenko and Roddick to be anywhere in the same league as Agassi, Becker, Edberg, Courier, Rafter...making Sampras' victories a bit stronger. Nadal is the only one likely to etch his name in tennis history and he hasn't convinced me that he is as good on other surfaces as he's on clay.

But the decade prior to that the competition was even more fierce. McEnroe, Wilander, Lendl, Becker--all these guys will be remembered as top-class tennis player. Davydenko? I don't think so!

Of course, one can't fault Federer for not havign stronger opponents--which makes it hard to determine how good he really is.
Logged

vincent

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,206
  • Money: 428470.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #62 on: September 09, 2007, 03:56:37 PM »
Fed wins in straight sets... 7-5, 6-1, 7-5.

He is incredible.

 :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:
let's not forget there isn't a single other player playing right now who can will have any claims to greatness in any other era...this is really quite smooth sailing. even sampras didn't have it this easy.
I am not so sure.. he is having it easy because he is just such a better player. His competition is playing very good tennis.
The quality of tennis played by Davydenko and Roddick was top class. Also, when he beat Nadal at Wimbledon, Nadal played wonderful tennis.
IMO, this guy is just damn good...both skills and mental strength wise.

I don't consider Davydenko and Roddick to be anywhere in the same league as Agassi, Becker, Edberg, Courier, Rafter...making Sampras' victories a bit stronger. Nadal is the only one likely to etch his name in tennis history and he hasn't convinced me that he is as good on other surfaces as he's on clay.

But the decade prior to that the competition was even more fierce. McEnroe, Wilander, Lendl, Becker--all these guys will be remembered as top-class tennis player. Davydenko? I don't think so!

Of course, one can't fault Federer for not havign stronger opponents--which makes it hard to determine how good he really is.

All the names you are listing were not competing (as on-going rivals) against each other. They were all greats in their own times. The only great rivalry that was in the past was Borg vs McEnroe , Connors vs McEnroe, Becker vs Edberg and finally Agassi vs Sampras. That rivalry could easily be compared with Federer vs Nadal of today. I agree with LN. Tennis of today has changed a lot with incredible hard and precision hitting and speed. During the final days of Wimbledon this year, they showed the 1982 final of McEnroe vs Connors just to kill time. It was nice to watch for nostalgic reason. But it was like watching one of todays matches in slow motion. So, for a true comparison, you need to see one of those matches and the replay of the final of Federer vs Nadal....
Logged

dextrous

  • Administrator
  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16,097
  • Money: 2027386.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #63 on: September 09, 2007, 08:45:06 PM »
Fed wins in straight sets... 7-5, 6-1, 7-5.

He is incredible.

 :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:
let's not forget there isn't a single other player playing right now who can will have any claims to greatness in any other era...this is really quite smooth sailing. even sampras didn't have it this easy.
I am not so sure.. he is having it easy because he is just such a better player. His competition is playing very good tennis.
The quality of tennis played by Davydenko and Roddick was top class. Also, when he beat Nadal at Wimbledon, Nadal played wonderful tennis.
IMO, this guy is just damn good...both skills and mental strength wise.

I don't consider Davydenko and Roddick to be anywhere in the same league as Agassi, Becker, Edberg, Courier, Rafter...making Sampras' victories a bit stronger. Nadal is the only one likely to etch his name in tennis history and he hasn't convinced me that he is as good on other surfaces as he's on clay.

But the decade prior to that the competition was even more fierce. McEnroe, Wilander, Lendl, Becker--all these guys will be remembered as top-class tennis player. Davydenko? I don't think so!

Of course, one can't fault Federer for not havign stronger opponents--which makes it hard to determine how good he really is.

All the names you are listing were not competing (as on-going rivals) against each other. They were all greats in their own times. The only great rivalry that was in the past was Borg vs McEnroe , Connors vs McEnroe, Becker vs Edberg and finally Agassi vs Sampras. That rivalry could easily be compared with Federer vs Nadal of today. I agree with LN. Tennis of today has changed a lot with incredible hard and precision hitting and speed. During the final days of Wimbledon this year, they showed the 1982 final of McEnroe vs Connors just to kill time. It was nice to watch for nostalgic reason. But it was like watching one of todays matches in slow motion. So, for a true comparison, you need to see one of those matches and the replay of the final of Federer vs Nadal....


They were not all "rivals" but they were all playing along the same time and were quite capable of beating each other on their day, though clearly Sampras was a bit better than the rest. Even a guy like Goran Ivanesvich was lurking around and good beat anyone. Today, that's not the case. There are a lot of decent players like Davydenko but they are no where close to even on paper being capable of beating Federer.

it is not possible to compare matches across eras because of one minor (but very significant change)--racquet and string technology. One has to wonder what sort of tennis John McEnroe would have played had he had access to some of the racquets of today!
Logged

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #64 on: September 09, 2007, 09:48:16 PM »
Final : Fed wins first set 7-6 ..saves 5 set points. Djokovic loses serve and then also the set on a double fault.

Loss of set after serving at 40-0 while leading 6-5 ..could demoralize him.

Mental disintegration ??
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #65 on: September 09, 2007, 10:37:12 PM »
Fed wins second set 7-6.. this time Djok blows 2 set points ;D
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #66 on: September 09, 2007, 11:29:10 PM »
Fed wins it all.. 7-6, 7-6, 6-4 !!!

Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity

keep-it-cool

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18,074
  • Money: 1714880.00
  • Thanda Thanda Kool Kool
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #67 on: September 10, 2007, 06:44:44 AM »
:notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:
Logged
Sachin Tendulkar gave the muhurat clap for 'Awwal Number' - that apart, he hasn't done much wrong in the last 20 yrs!

LosingNow

  • Team of the Century
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23,952
  • Money: 1501431.00
Re: US Open - 2007
« Reply #68 on: September 10, 2007, 08:12:03 PM »
Sampras' Slam record on Federer's mind
By Greg Garber
ESPN.com

NEW YORK -- When destiny's invitation was extended, with five fat first-set points on his serve, Novak Djokovic respectfully declined.

The dashing 20-year-old Serbian went quietly in the tiebreaker, double-faulting twice on his last three serves. In the second set, Djokovic had another set point (his seventh overall) hovering at waist level, stepped into it and -- ripped it just long. He could have -- should have -- won the first two sets, but instead he lost them.

Admittedly, Roger Federer did not play his best in Sunday's U.S. Open final. But just as he did at Wimbledon against Rafael Nadal, he managed to beat a talented, rising young rival. He spoiled Djokovic's first Grand Slam final appearance with a typically ruthless and mercenary effort, 7-6 (4), 7-6 (2), 6-4.

"I've enjoyed the challenge of young guys challenging me," Federer said afterward. "This is probably my biggest motivation out there. You know, seeing them challenge me, beating them in the final, it's really for me the best feeling, to be honest."

Upon those two less-than-lovely victories does the axis of men's tennis rotate. Federer has, once again, distanced himself from the field. He may not have had Maria Sharapova sitting in his family and friends box, but there is this consolation: He is on the brink of history.

Federer's 12th Grand Slam singles title pushes him past two titans of tennis, Bjorn Borg and Rod Laver. The 26-year-old from Switzerland is now tied with Roy Emerson and only two behind Pete Sampras.

"I think about it a lot now, honestly," Federer said. "In the beginning, I felt pushed a little bit into the corner, put under pressure about the situation because you don't win Slams like that; it's too tough.

"I feel these two-and-one-half weeks, it's so draining. I'm exhausted in the end. I know how tough it is. So to come so close already at my age is fantastic, and I really hope to break it."

Break down those Grand Slams in a simple graph that plots titles against age, and you will find that Federer is far ahead of the Sampras curve. In 2004, at the age of 22, Federer accelerated onward and upward with startling speed.
--
Federer vs. Sampras
Roger Federer won his 12th Grand Slam on Sunday, a month after turning 26. Pete Sampras was one month shy of his 28th birthday when he won his 12th Slam.
--
He won three of the four Grand Slams that year, something he has now done three of the past four years. This is a remarkable achievement, and it is difficult to appreciate its degree of difficulty. Each Grand Slam draw features 128 men with a chance to win. Factor in the uncertainty of injuries, recent form, training motivation, fatigue and widely varying court conditions, and Federer still has won 12 of the past 18 Grand Slams contested.

For context, consider that Borg's 11 Grand Slams were won in an impressive span of 21 appearances. Sampras' best streak was 9-for-17.

Perhaps the best way to compare Federer and Sampras is to look at their Grand Slam titles versus the opportunities. Sampras won his 12th major in his 40th Grand Slam tournament. Federer needed only 34. Sampras won his 13th and 14th Grand Slams in his 43rd and 52nd attempts, respectively.

It is hard to imagine Federer needing 18 more Slams to collect two more titles. That's the margin for error he has generated over Sampras.

To review: Federer has won five straight Wimbledons, four straight U.S. Opens and two straight Australian Opens. Any questions?

Federer's dominance has folks on the message boards, in the media and even the fans at Arthur Ashe Stadium keening for a new champion, aching for some drama. Why? You are seeing a champion in his absolute prime; this is as good as it gets.

The past two years, only Nadal has prevented Federer from winning a single-season Grand Slam. Based on those two finals (Federer lost in four sets), it's conceivable that Federer could actually break through at Roland Garros and win his first French Open title. It is just as possible that Nadal will return the favor at Wimbledon, where he has reached the past two finals and almost beat Federer in a spirited five-set match in July.

Even with Federer's three majors this year, there is evidence that his game has maxed out. He lost two sets on the way to the final, something he hadn't done since last year's French Open. And giving Djokovic seven set points is not something that, going forward, is advisable. You get the idea that with another year of experience Djokovic won't tighten in so many big moments.

"I think I was mentally weaker today on the important points," Djokovic said, "than he was mentally stronger."(LN: At the highest levels of sport, the term "mental strength" keeps popping up again and again)

So let's break it down and see how many Grand Slam titles Federer is likely to collect by the time he leaves the game.

Based on his public comments, those close to the game believe Federer is likely to play at least until he's 30. So, to be conservative, let's give him four more seasons. That's 16 Grand Slam opportunities. For two of those years, 2008-09, he is still likely to be in his prime and supremely motivated to break Sampras' record.

Federer is likely to benefit from the expected faster surface at the Australian Open, so give him one of the next two. Considering the improvement of Nadal and Djokovic, again, conservatively, give him one more Wimbledon and U.S. Open title. That's three in the next two years, and that would be enough to break the record.

Would it be possible for Federer to go two years, 2010 and 2011, without adding to that total? Not likely.

"I think he'll get to 18," said Bud Collins, the longtime tennis maven and a contributor to ESPN.com.

Said Peter Bodo of Tennis Magazine, who also is a contributor to ESPN.com. "Maybe 16, 17? He could have 18. It's pretty phenomenal. You kind of run out of things to say. Just sit back and watch excellence.

"The late Open era has blown up the record book. It seems like every generation produces the greatest player ever. After Laver, they used to debate whether Connors was the greatest, and now Federer.

"The landscape has changed. Maybe the all-time Grand Slam winner someday will have 30 Grand Slams."

What about Federer? How many does he think he'll finish with?

"I don't know," he said, shaking his head. "I really don't know. I mean, I hope more than Pete."

The two have grown friendly, and after the ATP's year-end tournament in Shanghai this November there will be three exhibitions between Federer and Sampras in the Far East. To be followed, Federer said, by a March 10, 2008 exhibition at Madison Square Garden in New York.

"I think Sampras and Federer have this thing in common," Djokovic said. "They are very similar in that they are mentally very strong in the important moments; they always play their best. They're ice-cold faces, just going for the shot.

--
Of the last 18 Grand Slams contested, Roger Federer has won 12 of them.
--
"That's why they're [the] two best players ever for me."

Federer, clearly, is growing more comfortable in his role of tennis' leading man.

An hour before the late-afternoon match, seven-time Grand Slam titlist John McEnroe walked through the locker room and was stunned to see Federer wearing his all-black evening outfit.

"Are you serious?" asked McEnroe, aware that black tends to make the sun feel even hotter.

Federer smiled and nodded.

"Very gutsy," McEnroe said.

Bring the heat, Darth Federer seemed to be saying; I am not afraid to be the villain.

"I thought all-black is kind of a cool thing," Federer said. "I can only pull it off in New York."

There was a decided edge to Federer in his postmatch press conference. He talked some subtle, high-end trash (see his first quote above) -- and even though he was smiling, he seemed quite serious.

Federer was asked if Djokovic, ranked No. 3, might be ready to take No. 2 from Nadal.

"It's getting closer," Federer said. "It probably depends on who finishes better at the end of the year. No. 2, No. 3 doesn't matter much.

"It's No. 1 that matters. That's how it goes."

Greg Garber is a senior writer for ESPN.com.
Logged
Play with heart. Win with class. Lose with dignity
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
 


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
EA 2007- A failure again??
General Cricket Discussion
suraj 5 354 Last post December 12, 2006, 06:40:34 AM
by dhruvdeepak
Chennai Open - 2007
Other Sports
poondu 1 281 Last post December 28, 2006, 10:14:07 PM
by dextrous
On an irresistible and awe-inspiring ascent : Australian Open 2007
Other Sports
poondu 61 2017 Last post January 28, 2007, 12:11:19 PM
by LosingNow
Was Vaas the ZK of 2007
General Cricket Discussion
Cover Point 2 242 Last post April 29, 2007, 01:33:00 PM
by sudzz
How polaks see germans in 2007
The World Report
feverpitch 0 254 Last post July 07, 2007, 05:50:43 AM
by feverpitch
M-W Word of 2007..
General Cricket Discussion
LosingNow 2 189 Last post December 12, 2007, 12:34:25 PM
by Blwe_torch
Is this 50-50 WC win sweeter than the 2007 20-20 WC win?
General Cricket Discussion
LosingNow 9 280 Last post April 03, 2011, 04:10:39 AM
by WicketView